TY - JOUR
T1 - Equity of our future oceans
T2 - practices and outcomes in marine science research
AU - Alexander, K. A.
AU - Fleming, A.
AU - Bax, N.
AU - Garcia, C.
AU - Jansen, J.
AU - Maxwell, K. H.
AU - Melbourne-Thomas, J.
AU - Mustonen, T.
AU - Pecl, G. T.
AU - Shaw, J.
AU - Syme, G.
AU - Ogier, E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research leading to these results received funding from a Research Enhancement Program grant from the University of Tasmania.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aspire to a society where ways to improve inclusivity and diversity of equity are actively explored. Here, we examine how equity is considered in a suite of papers that explored possible sustainable futures for the oceans, and mapped out pathways to achieve these futures. Our analysis revealed that a large range of equity issues were recognised and considered, in outcome-based (i.e. distributive), process-based (i.e. procedural) and concept (i.e. contextual) dimensions. However, often, the equity problem was not explicitly stated. Rather it was implied through the action pathway identified to move towards a more sustainable future, highlighting that reducing inequity is interlinked with improving sustainability. Based on these findings, we reflect on the way equity is conceptualised and considered within this work as well as futures science for the oceans more broadly. A key lesson learnt is that science and knowledge production are immediate areas where we can work to improve equity. We can build capacity to understand and include equity issues. We can develop mechanisms to be more inclusive and diverse. We can also critically reflect on our own practices to fundamentally challenge how we work and think in the space of marine science research.
AB - The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aspire to a society where ways to improve inclusivity and diversity of equity are actively explored. Here, we examine how equity is considered in a suite of papers that explored possible sustainable futures for the oceans, and mapped out pathways to achieve these futures. Our analysis revealed that a large range of equity issues were recognised and considered, in outcome-based (i.e. distributive), process-based (i.e. procedural) and concept (i.e. contextual) dimensions. However, often, the equity problem was not explicitly stated. Rather it was implied through the action pathway identified to move towards a more sustainable future, highlighting that reducing inequity is interlinked with improving sustainability. Based on these findings, we reflect on the way equity is conceptualised and considered within this work as well as futures science for the oceans more broadly. A key lesson learnt is that science and knowledge production are immediate areas where we can work to improve equity. We can build capacity to understand and include equity issues. We can develop mechanisms to be more inclusive and diverse. We can also critically reflect on our own practices to fundamentally challenge how we work and think in the space of marine science research.
KW - Equity
KW - Oceans governance
KW - Resource use
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106690650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11160-021-09661-z
DO - 10.1007/s11160-021-09661-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85106690650
SN - 0960-3166
VL - 32
SP - 297
EP - 311
JO - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
JF - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
ER -