Entanglement certification from theory to experiment

Nicolai Friis, Giuseppe Vitagliano, Mehul Malik, Marcus Huber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Entanglement is an important resource for quantum technologies. There are many ways quantum systems can be entangled, ranging from the two-qubit case to entanglement in high dimensions or between many parties. Consequently, many entanglement quantifiers and classifiers exist, corresponding to different operational paradigms and mathematical techniques. However, for most quantum systems, exactly quantifying the amount of entanglement is extremely demanding, if at all possible. Furthermore, it is difficult to experimentally control and measure complex quantum states. Therefore, there are various approaches to experimentally detect and certify entanglement when exact quantification is not an option. The applicability and performance of these methods strongly depend on the assumptions regarding the involved quantum states and measurements, in short, on the available prior information about the quantum system. In this Review, we discuss the most commonly used quantifiers of entanglement and survey the state-of-the-art detection and certification methods, including their respective underlying assumptions, from both a theoretical and an experimental point of view.
LanguageEnglish
Pages72-87
Number of pages16
JournalNature Reviews Physics
Volume1
Issue number1
Early online date19 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

certification
classifiers
resources

Cite this

Friis, Nicolai ; Vitagliano, Giuseppe ; Malik, Mehul ; Huber, Marcus. / Entanglement certification from theory to experiment. In: Nature Reviews Physics. 2019 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 72-87.
@article{25732951d4044d0a93cea07c76e7e3f8,
title = "Entanglement certification from theory to experiment",
abstract = "Entanglement is an important resource for quantum technologies. There are many ways quantum systems can be entangled, ranging from the two-qubit case to entanglement in high dimensions or between many parties. Consequently, many entanglement quantifiers and classifiers exist, corresponding to different operational paradigms and mathematical techniques. However, for most quantum systems, exactly quantifying the amount of entanglement is extremely demanding, if at all possible. Furthermore, it is difficult to experimentally control and measure complex quantum states. Therefore, there are various approaches to experimentally detect and certify entanglement when exact quantification is not an option. The applicability and performance of these methods strongly depend on the assumptions regarding the involved quantum states and measurements, in short, on the available prior information about the quantum system. In this Review, we discuss the most commonly used quantifiers of entanglement and survey the state-of-the-art detection and certification methods, including their respective underlying assumptions, from both a theoretical and an experimental point of view.",
author = "Nicolai Friis and Giuseppe Vitagliano and Mehul Malik and Marcus Huber",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s42254-018-0003-5",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "72--87",
journal = "Nature Reviews Physics",
issn = "2522-5820",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Entanglement certification from theory to experiment. / Friis, Nicolai; Vitagliano, Giuseppe; Malik, Mehul; Huber, Marcus.

In: Nature Reviews Physics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 72-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entanglement certification from theory to experiment

AU - Friis, Nicolai

AU - Vitagliano, Giuseppe

AU - Malik, Mehul

AU - Huber, Marcus

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Entanglement is an important resource for quantum technologies. There are many ways quantum systems can be entangled, ranging from the two-qubit case to entanglement in high dimensions or between many parties. Consequently, many entanglement quantifiers and classifiers exist, corresponding to different operational paradigms and mathematical techniques. However, for most quantum systems, exactly quantifying the amount of entanglement is extremely demanding, if at all possible. Furthermore, it is difficult to experimentally control and measure complex quantum states. Therefore, there are various approaches to experimentally detect and certify entanglement when exact quantification is not an option. The applicability and performance of these methods strongly depend on the assumptions regarding the involved quantum states and measurements, in short, on the available prior information about the quantum system. In this Review, we discuss the most commonly used quantifiers of entanglement and survey the state-of-the-art detection and certification methods, including their respective underlying assumptions, from both a theoretical and an experimental point of view.

AB - Entanglement is an important resource for quantum technologies. There are many ways quantum systems can be entangled, ranging from the two-qubit case to entanglement in high dimensions or between many parties. Consequently, many entanglement quantifiers and classifiers exist, corresponding to different operational paradigms and mathematical techniques. However, for most quantum systems, exactly quantifying the amount of entanglement is extremely demanding, if at all possible. Furthermore, it is difficult to experimentally control and measure complex quantum states. Therefore, there are various approaches to experimentally detect and certify entanglement when exact quantification is not an option. The applicability and performance of these methods strongly depend on the assumptions regarding the involved quantum states and measurements, in short, on the available prior information about the quantum system. In this Review, we discuss the most commonly used quantifiers of entanglement and survey the state-of-the-art detection and certification methods, including their respective underlying assumptions, from both a theoretical and an experimental point of view.

U2 - 10.1038/s42254-018-0003-5

DO - 10.1038/s42254-018-0003-5

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 72

EP - 87

JO - Nature Reviews Physics

T2 - Nature Reviews Physics

JF - Nature Reviews Physics

SN - 2522-5820

IS - 1

ER -