Abstract
This research contributes to practice in the field of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) by demonstrating how business management approaches and tools can enhance the content and performance management of in-sessional academic skills provision. It was the result of a teaching and research collaboration between a Business Management (Logistics) lecturer and an EAP lecturer. The framework used in this research to evaluate student engagement with in-sessional provision is the CEM Model (Sloan & Porter, 2010) (Conceptualisation, Embedding and Mapping), and forms the basis for an evaluation, using a Best-Worst Discrete Choice Survey, to uncover from a student perspective the most valued academic skills content. From the Business Management perspective, the findings led to a reconceptualization of the CEM Model as a balanced scorecard, a strategic performance measurement tool to assess levels of student, staff and institutional engagement. For EAP practitioners the findings inform identification of in-sessional EAP provision to support international postgraduate students through enhancing the content and performance management of in-sessional EAP provision.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 56-70 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of English for Academic Purposes |
Volume | 27 |
Early online date | 22 Apr 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2017 |
Keywords
- Best-Worst Survey
- CEM model
- In-sessional EAP
- Student engagement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Education
- Linguistics and Language