Engaging with quality via the CEM model: Enhancing the content and performance management of postgraduate in-sessional academic skills provision

Olwyn Alexander, Diane Sloan, Kate Hughes, Stephanie Ashby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This research contributes to practice in the field of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) by demonstrating how business management approaches and tools can enhance the content and performance management of in-sessional academic skills provision. It was the result of a teaching and research collaboration between a Business Management (Logistics) lecturer and an EAP lecturer. The framework used in this research to evaluate student engagement with in-sessional provision is the CEM Model (Sloan & Porter, 2010) (Conceptualisation, Embedding and Mapping), and forms the basis for an evaluation, using a Best-Worst Discrete Choice Survey, to uncover from a student perspective the most valued academic skills content. From the Business Management perspective, the findings led to a reconceptualization of the CEM Model as a balanced scorecard, a strategic performance measurement tool to assess levels of student, staff and institutional engagement. For EAP practitioners the findings inform identification of in-sessional EAP provision to support international postgraduate students through enhancing the content and performance management of in-sessional EAP provision.

LanguageEnglish
Pages56-70
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of English for Academic Purposes
Volume27
Early online date22 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Fingerprint

business management
management
performance
university teacher
student
Balanced Scorecard
performance measurement
logistics
Performance Management
English for Academic Purposes
staff
Teaching
evaluation
Business Management
Lecturers

Keywords

  • Best-Worst Survey
  • CEM model
  • In-sessional EAP
  • Student engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{fff5f6cf786f406eb4071a748bbc8b40,
title = "Engaging with quality via the CEM model: Enhancing the content and performance management of postgraduate in-sessional academic skills provision",
abstract = "This research contributes to practice in the field of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) by demonstrating how business management approaches and tools can enhance the content and performance management of in-sessional academic skills provision. It was the result of a teaching and research collaboration between a Business Management (Logistics) lecturer and an EAP lecturer. The framework used in this research to evaluate student engagement with in-sessional provision is the CEM Model (Sloan & Porter, 2010) (Conceptualisation, Embedding and Mapping), and forms the basis for an evaluation, using a Best-Worst Discrete Choice Survey, to uncover from a student perspective the most valued academic skills content. From the Business Management perspective, the findings led to a reconceptualization of the CEM Model as a balanced scorecard, a strategic performance measurement tool to assess levels of student, staff and institutional engagement. For EAP practitioners the findings inform identification of in-sessional EAP provision to support international postgraduate students through enhancing the content and performance management of in-sessional EAP provision.",
keywords = "Best-Worst Survey, CEM model, In-sessional EAP, Student engagement",
author = "Olwyn Alexander and Diane Sloan and Kate Hughes and Stephanie Ashby",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "56--70",
journal = "Journal of English for Academic Purposes",
issn = "1475-1585",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Engaging with quality via the CEM model : Enhancing the content and performance management of postgraduate in-sessional academic skills provision. / Alexander, Olwyn; Sloan, Diane; Hughes, Kate; Ashby, Stephanie.

In: Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Vol. 27, 05.2017, p. 56-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engaging with quality via the CEM model

T2 - Journal of English for Academic Purposes

AU - Alexander, Olwyn

AU - Sloan, Diane

AU - Hughes, Kate

AU - Ashby, Stephanie

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - This research contributes to practice in the field of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) by demonstrating how business management approaches and tools can enhance the content and performance management of in-sessional academic skills provision. It was the result of a teaching and research collaboration between a Business Management (Logistics) lecturer and an EAP lecturer. The framework used in this research to evaluate student engagement with in-sessional provision is the CEM Model (Sloan & Porter, 2010) (Conceptualisation, Embedding and Mapping), and forms the basis for an evaluation, using a Best-Worst Discrete Choice Survey, to uncover from a student perspective the most valued academic skills content. From the Business Management perspective, the findings led to a reconceptualization of the CEM Model as a balanced scorecard, a strategic performance measurement tool to assess levels of student, staff and institutional engagement. For EAP practitioners the findings inform identification of in-sessional EAP provision to support international postgraduate students through enhancing the content and performance management of in-sessional EAP provision.

AB - This research contributes to practice in the field of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) by demonstrating how business management approaches and tools can enhance the content and performance management of in-sessional academic skills provision. It was the result of a teaching and research collaboration between a Business Management (Logistics) lecturer and an EAP lecturer. The framework used in this research to evaluate student engagement with in-sessional provision is the CEM Model (Sloan & Porter, 2010) (Conceptualisation, Embedding and Mapping), and forms the basis for an evaluation, using a Best-Worst Discrete Choice Survey, to uncover from a student perspective the most valued academic skills content. From the Business Management perspective, the findings led to a reconceptualization of the CEM Model as a balanced scorecard, a strategic performance measurement tool to assess levels of student, staff and institutional engagement. For EAP practitioners the findings inform identification of in-sessional EAP provision to support international postgraduate students through enhancing the content and performance management of in-sessional EAP provision.

KW - Best-Worst Survey

KW - CEM model

KW - In-sessional EAP

KW - Student engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018519553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.005

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 56

EP - 70

JO - Journal of English for Academic Purposes

JF - Journal of English for Academic Purposes

SN - 1475-1585

ER -