It is unfashionable to suggest that enactive processes - including some that involve the mirror neuron system - might contribute to the comprehension of sign language. The present essay formulates and defends a version of that unfashionable suggestion, as it applies to certain forms of syntactic processing. There is evidence that has been thought to weigh against any such suggestion, coming from neuroimaging experiments and from the study of Deaf aphasics. In both cases it is shown to be unpersuasive.
|Number of pages||16|
|Journal||Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences|
|Early online date||14 Nov 2017|
|Publication status||E-pub ahead of print - 14 Nov 2017|
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Enactive processing of the syntax of sign language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Graham H. Turner
- School of Social Sciences - Professor Emeritus
- School of Social Sciences, Languages & Intercultural Studies - Professor Emeritus