Empowerment, capabilities and homelessness: the limitations of employment-focused social enterprises in addressing complex needs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

‘Empowerment’ is often said to be a key objective of policies aiming to improve the lives of homeless people and other vulnerable groups. This paper contends that Sen and Nussbaum’s influential ‘capability’ approach provides an appropriate means of operationalising this arguably nebulous concept. Via a critique of work-focused social enterprises in the homelessness field, as promoted by successive UK governments, it seeks to demonstrate the importance of a multidimensional approach to enhancing the capabilities of homeless people with complex support needs. Specifically, it argues for attention to be given to four (independently important) empowerment ‘domains’: the bodily domain; the political and economic domain; the social and emotional domain; and the creative, intellectual and self-development domain. This broad-based understanding of empowerment implies that a balance must be struck between specialist provision, such as the bespoke social enterprises focussed upon in this paper, and more integrative models which seek to support homeless people in ordinary community and workplace settings.
LanguageEnglish
Pages137–155
Number of pages19
JournalHousing, Theory and Society
Volume35
Issue number1
Early online date16 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

homelessness
empowerment
workplace
community
economics
Group

Cite this

@article{eb48bcacff0d4d4f9e92b2a76dd745f0,
title = "Empowerment, capabilities and homelessness: the limitations of employment-focused social enterprises in addressing complex needs",
abstract = "‘Empowerment’ is often said to be a key objective of policies aiming to improve the lives of homeless people and other vulnerable groups. This paper contends that Sen and Nussbaum’s influential ‘capability’ approach provides an appropriate means of operationalising this arguably nebulous concept. Via a critique of work-focused social enterprises in the homelessness field, as promoted by successive UK governments, it seeks to demonstrate the importance of a multidimensional approach to enhancing the capabilities of homeless people with complex support needs. Specifically, it argues for attention to be given to four (independently important) empowerment ‘domains’: the bodily domain; the political and economic domain; the social and emotional domain; and the creative, intellectual and self-development domain. This broad-based understanding of empowerment implies that a balance must be struck between specialist provision, such as the bespoke social enterprises focussed upon in this paper, and more integrative models which seek to support homeless people in ordinary community and workplace settings.",
author = "Aslan Tanekenov and Suzanne Fitzpatrick and Sarah Johnsen",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14036096.2017.1290676",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "137–155",
journal = "Housing, Theory and Society",
issn = "1403-6096",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowerment, capabilities and homelessness: the limitations of employment-focused social enterprises in addressing complex needs

AU - Tanekenov, Aslan

AU - Fitzpatrick, Suzanne

AU - Johnsen, Sarah

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - ‘Empowerment’ is often said to be a key objective of policies aiming to improve the lives of homeless people and other vulnerable groups. This paper contends that Sen and Nussbaum’s influential ‘capability’ approach provides an appropriate means of operationalising this arguably nebulous concept. Via a critique of work-focused social enterprises in the homelessness field, as promoted by successive UK governments, it seeks to demonstrate the importance of a multidimensional approach to enhancing the capabilities of homeless people with complex support needs. Specifically, it argues for attention to be given to four (independently important) empowerment ‘domains’: the bodily domain; the political and economic domain; the social and emotional domain; and the creative, intellectual and self-development domain. This broad-based understanding of empowerment implies that a balance must be struck between specialist provision, such as the bespoke social enterprises focussed upon in this paper, and more integrative models which seek to support homeless people in ordinary community and workplace settings.

AB - ‘Empowerment’ is often said to be a key objective of policies aiming to improve the lives of homeless people and other vulnerable groups. This paper contends that Sen and Nussbaum’s influential ‘capability’ approach provides an appropriate means of operationalising this arguably nebulous concept. Via a critique of work-focused social enterprises in the homelessness field, as promoted by successive UK governments, it seeks to demonstrate the importance of a multidimensional approach to enhancing the capabilities of homeless people with complex support needs. Specifically, it argues for attention to be given to four (independently important) empowerment ‘domains’: the bodily domain; the political and economic domain; the social and emotional domain; and the creative, intellectual and self-development domain. This broad-based understanding of empowerment implies that a balance must be struck between specialist provision, such as the bespoke social enterprises focussed upon in this paper, and more integrative models which seek to support homeless people in ordinary community and workplace settings.

U2 - 10.1080/14036096.2017.1290676

DO - 10.1080/14036096.2017.1290676

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 137

EP - 155

JO - Housing, Theory and Society

T2 - Housing, Theory and Society

JF - Housing, Theory and Society

SN - 1403-6096

IS - 1

ER -