Emotional Labour and the Autonomy of Dependent Self-Employed Workers: The Limitations of Digital Managerial Control in the Home Credit Sector

Esme Terry*, Abigail Marks, Arek Dakessian, Dimitris Christopoulos

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Changes to the labour process in the home credit sector have exposed the industry’s agency workforce to increased levels of digital managerial control through the introduction of lending applications and algorithmic decision-making techniques. This article highlights the heterogeneous nature of the impact of digitalisation on the labour process and worker autonomy – specifically, in terms of workers’ engagement in unquantified emotional labour. By considering the limitations of digital control in relation to qualitative elements of the labour process, it becomes evident that emotional labour has the scope to be a source of autonomy for dependent self-employed workers when set against a backdrop of heightened digital control. This article therefore contributes to ongoing labour process debates surrounding digitalisation, quantified workers and digital managerial control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-682
Number of pages18
JournalWork, Employment and Society
Volume36
Issue number4
Early online date17 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Keywords

  • algorithmic management
  • alternative finance
  • automation
  • dependent self-employment
  • digital managerial control
  • digitalisation
  • emotional labour
  • home credit
  • labour process
  • worker autonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emotional Labour and the Autonomy of Dependent Self-Employed Workers: The Limitations of Digital Managerial Control in the Home Credit Sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this