TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficient methods for approximating the Shapley value for asset sharing in energy communities
AU - Cremers, Sho
AU - Robu, Valentin
AU - Zhang, Peter
AU - Andoni, Merlinda
AU - Norbu, Sonam
AU - Flynn, David
N1 - Funding Information:
In terms of funding, Valentin Robu acknowledges the support of the project “TESTBED2: Testing and Evaluating Sophisticated information and communication Technologies for enaBling scalablE smart griD Deployment”, funded by the European Union Horizon2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) [Grant agreement number: 872172 ]. Sonam Norbu, Merlinda Andoni, Valentin Robu and David Flynn also acknowledge the support of the InnovateUK Responsive Flexibility (ReFLEX) project [ref: 104780 ]. Merlinda Andoni and David Flynn also acknowledge the support of the UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council through the National Centre for Energy Systems Integration (CESI) (grant EP/P001173/1 ) and DecarbonISation PAThways for Cooling and Heating (DISPATCH) project (grant EP/V042955/1 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/2/1
Y1 - 2023/2/1
N2 - With the emergence of energy communities, where a number of prosumers invest in shared generation and storage, the issue of fair allocation of benefits is increasingly important. The Shapley value has attracted increasing interest for redistribution in energy settings — however, computing it exactly is intractable beyond a few dozen prosumers. In this paper, we first conduct a systematic review of the literature on the use of Shapley value in energy-related applications, as well as efforts to compute or approximate it. Next, we formalise the main methods for approximating the Shapley value in community energy settings, and propose a new one, which we call the stratified expected value approximation. To compare the performance of these methods, we design a novel method for exact Shapley value computation, which can be applied to communities of up to several hundred agents by clustering the prosumers into a smaller number of demand profiles. We perform a large-scale experimental comparison of the proposed methods, for communities of up to 200 prosumers, using large-scale, publicly available data from two large-scale energy trials in the UK (UKERC Energy Data Centre, 2017, UK Power Networks Innovation, 2021). Our analysis shows that, as the number of agents in the community increases, the relative difference to the exact Shapley value converges to under 1% for all the approximation methods considered. In particular, for most experimental scenarios, we show that there is no statistical difference between the newly proposed stratified expected value method and the existing state-of-the-art method that uses adaptive sampling (O'Brien et al., 2015), although the cost of computation for large communities is an order of magnitude lower.
AB - With the emergence of energy communities, where a number of prosumers invest in shared generation and storage, the issue of fair allocation of benefits is increasingly important. The Shapley value has attracted increasing interest for redistribution in energy settings — however, computing it exactly is intractable beyond a few dozen prosumers. In this paper, we first conduct a systematic review of the literature on the use of Shapley value in energy-related applications, as well as efforts to compute or approximate it. Next, we formalise the main methods for approximating the Shapley value in community energy settings, and propose a new one, which we call the stratified expected value approximation. To compare the performance of these methods, we design a novel method for exact Shapley value computation, which can be applied to communities of up to several hundred agents by clustering the prosumers into a smaller number of demand profiles. We perform a large-scale experimental comparison of the proposed methods, for communities of up to 200 prosumers, using large-scale, publicly available data from two large-scale energy trials in the UK (UKERC Energy Data Centre, 2017, UK Power Networks Innovation, 2021). Our analysis shows that, as the number of agents in the community increases, the relative difference to the exact Shapley value converges to under 1% for all the approximation methods considered. In particular, for most experimental scenarios, we show that there is no statistical difference between the newly proposed stratified expected value method and the existing state-of-the-art method that uses adaptive sampling (O'Brien et al., 2015), although the cost of computation for large communities is an order of magnitude lower.
KW - Energy community
KW - Fair allocation
KW - Prosumer
KW - Shapley value
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145563159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120328
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120328
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145563159
SN - 0306-2619
VL - 331
JO - Applied Energy
JF - Applied Energy
M1 - 120328
ER -