Effects of metal nanoparticles on the lateral line system and behaviour in early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Paul L. McNeil*, David Boyle, Theodore B. Henry, Richard D. Handy, Katherine A. Sloman

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    53 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The unique physicochemistry and potential toxicity of manufactured nanoparticles (NPs) requires innovative approaches for the assessment of toxicity to aquatic organisms. Here, the toxicity of Cu-NPs, Ag-NPs and TiO2-NPs on the lateral line system of free-swimming zebrafish embryos was investigated and compared to appropriate metal salts or bulk material controls. Fish were exposed for 4h at 96-h post-fertilization. Metal salt (CuSO4 and AgNO3) controls reduced the number of functional lateral line neuromasts (LLN) to <5% of unexposed controls, but no effect on LLN was observed for TiO2-NPs or Ag-NPs. Exposure to Cu-NPs caused only a 15% reduction in LLN. Performance of positive rheotaxis was reduced by Cu-NPs, Ag-NPs, and the metal salt controls. The data show that some metal NPs can affect LLN and fish behaviour (rheotaxis) important for survival, and that effects were different from those of comparable metal ion controls. Capsule: We demonstrate that behaviour is a particularly sensitive indicator of metal NP exposure in fish and highlight the interaction between behaviour and external tissue surfaces.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)318-323
    Number of pages6
    JournalAquatic Toxicology
    Volume152
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

    Keywords

    • Copper
    • Embryo
    • Neuromast
    • Rheotaxis
    • Silver
    • Titanium

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Aquatic Science
    • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of metal nanoparticles on the lateral line system and behaviour in early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this