'Doing it already'?: stakeholder perceptions of Housing First in the UK

Sarah Johnsen, Ligia Teixeira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When first developed in the United States, ‘Housing First’ was highly controversial given its departure from mainstream ‘linear’ service models for homeless people with complex support needs. It has nevertheless since been heralded as presenting a key ‘antidote’ to chronic homelessness and is being replicated across North America and Europe with what might be regarded as ‘evangelical’ fervour. Reception to Housing First has been noticeably more reserved in the UK to date. This paper explores the reasons underpinning many UK stakeholders’ scepticism about the model. It argues that this derives, in part, from the fact that Housing First implementation in the UK would not represent the scale of paradigm shift that it has elsewhere, thus the model is considered far less revolutionary. Furthermore, whilst most stakeholders find aspects of the approach very attractive, ideological and pragmatic reservations dictate that robust evidence derived from pilot projects in Britain will be required – especially as regards outcomes for individuals with active substance misuse problems – before any wholesale ‘conversion’ to Housing First is likely in the UK.
LanguageEnglish
Pages183-203
JournalInternational Journal of Housing Policy
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date28 May 2012
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

stakeholder
housing
pilot project
homelessness
pragmatics
paradigm
evidence

Keywords

  • Homelessness
  • complex support needs
  • housing first
  • housing models
  • policy transfer
  • UK

Cite this

@article{785f898b62dd46318c9656ccee21c527,
title = "'Doing it already'?: stakeholder perceptions of Housing First in the UK",
abstract = "When first developed in the United States, ‘Housing First’ was highly controversial given its departure from mainstream ‘linear’ service models for homeless people with complex support needs. It has nevertheless since been heralded as presenting a key ‘antidote’ to chronic homelessness and is being replicated across North America and Europe with what might be regarded as ‘evangelical’ fervour. Reception to Housing First has been noticeably more reserved in the UK to date. This paper explores the reasons underpinning many UK stakeholders’ scepticism about the model. It argues that this derives, in part, from the fact that Housing First implementation in the UK would not represent the scale of paradigm shift that it has elsewhere, thus the model is considered far less revolutionary. Furthermore, whilst most stakeholders find aspects of the approach very attractive, ideological and pragmatic reservations dictate that robust evidence derived from pilot projects in Britain will be required – especially as regards outcomes for individuals with active substance misuse problems – before any wholesale ‘conversion’ to Housing First is likely in the UK.",
keywords = "Homelessness, complex support needs, housing first, housing models, policy transfer, UK",
author = "Sarah Johnsen and Ligia Teixeira",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/14616718.2012.681579",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "183--203",
journal = "International Journal of Housing Policy",
issn = "1461-6718",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

'Doing it already'?: stakeholder perceptions of Housing First in the UK. / Johnsen, Sarah; Teixeira, Ligia.

In: International Journal of Housing Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2012, p. 183-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Doing it already'?: stakeholder perceptions of Housing First in the UK

AU - Johnsen,Sarah

AU - Teixeira,Ligia

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - When first developed in the United States, ‘Housing First’ was highly controversial given its departure from mainstream ‘linear’ service models for homeless people with complex support needs. It has nevertheless since been heralded as presenting a key ‘antidote’ to chronic homelessness and is being replicated across North America and Europe with what might be regarded as ‘evangelical’ fervour. Reception to Housing First has been noticeably more reserved in the UK to date. This paper explores the reasons underpinning many UK stakeholders’ scepticism about the model. It argues that this derives, in part, from the fact that Housing First implementation in the UK would not represent the scale of paradigm shift that it has elsewhere, thus the model is considered far less revolutionary. Furthermore, whilst most stakeholders find aspects of the approach very attractive, ideological and pragmatic reservations dictate that robust evidence derived from pilot projects in Britain will be required – especially as regards outcomes for individuals with active substance misuse problems – before any wholesale ‘conversion’ to Housing First is likely in the UK.

AB - When first developed in the United States, ‘Housing First’ was highly controversial given its departure from mainstream ‘linear’ service models for homeless people with complex support needs. It has nevertheless since been heralded as presenting a key ‘antidote’ to chronic homelessness and is being replicated across North America and Europe with what might be regarded as ‘evangelical’ fervour. Reception to Housing First has been noticeably more reserved in the UK to date. This paper explores the reasons underpinning many UK stakeholders’ scepticism about the model. It argues that this derives, in part, from the fact that Housing First implementation in the UK would not represent the scale of paradigm shift that it has elsewhere, thus the model is considered far less revolutionary. Furthermore, whilst most stakeholders find aspects of the approach very attractive, ideological and pragmatic reservations dictate that robust evidence derived from pilot projects in Britain will be required – especially as regards outcomes for individuals with active substance misuse problems – before any wholesale ‘conversion’ to Housing First is likely in the UK.

KW - Homelessness

KW - complex support needs

KW - housing first

KW - housing models

KW - policy transfer

KW - UK

U2 - 10.1080/14616718.2012.681579

DO - 10.1080/14616718.2012.681579

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 183

EP - 203

JO - International Journal of Housing Policy

T2 - International Journal of Housing Policy

JF - International Journal of Housing Policy

SN - 1461-6718

IS - 2

ER -