Abstract
This paper uses a spatial multi-intervention difference-in-difference method to examine the opening and planning impacts of transport improvements on land markets in a mega-city of China. The results suggest the significant heterogeneity in the capitalization effects from changes in rail access on prices for different land uses in affected areas versus unaffected areas. Residential and commercial land parcels receiving increased station proximity experience appreciable price premiums. However, such effects vary widely over space. These results add to the evidence that public investments have an important role to play in spurring the spatially targeted land market.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 242-269 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- China
- Land markets
- Transport infrastructure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Urban Studies
- Economics and Econometrics
- Accounting
- Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does planning matter? Effects on land markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver