TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Anyone see the Irony here?
T2 - 2nd Workshop on Perspectivist Approaches to NLP 2023
AU - Frenda, Simona
AU - Lo, Soda Marem
AU - Casola, Silvia
AU - Scarlini, Bianca
AU - Marco, Cristina
AU - Basile, Valerio
AU - Bernardi, Davide
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Copyright © 2023 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
PY - 2023/9/30
Y1 - 2023/9/30
N2 - In the framework of perspectivism, analyzing how people perceive pragmatic phenomena, like irony, is relevant for deeply understanding the different points of view, and for creating more robust perspective-aware models. This paper presents a linguistic analysis of irony perception in 11 perspectivist models. Each model is trained on annotations by crowd-sourcing workers different in gender, age, and nationalities. Due to the sparsity of the dataset, we examine the texts classified as ironic and not-ironic by these perspectivist models, and identify linguistic patterns that all perspectives associate with irony. To our knowledge, we are the first to also provide evidence for the different linguistic patterns perceived as ironic by a specific perspective. For example, models trained on data annotated by American and Australian annotators are more inclined to classify a text as ironic when it includes a negative sentiment, while models trained on data annotated by the youngest annotators are particularly influenced by words related to immoral behaviors. Warning: This paper could contain content that is offensive or upsetting for the reader.
AB - In the framework of perspectivism, analyzing how people perceive pragmatic phenomena, like irony, is relevant for deeply understanding the different points of view, and for creating more robust perspective-aware models. This paper presents a linguistic analysis of irony perception in 11 perspectivist models. Each model is trained on annotations by crowd-sourcing workers different in gender, age, and nationalities. Due to the sparsity of the dataset, we examine the texts classified as ironic and not-ironic by these perspectivist models, and identify linguistic patterns that all perspectives associate with irony. To our knowledge, we are the first to also provide evidence for the different linguistic patterns perceived as ironic by a specific perspective. For example, models trained on data annotated by American and Australian annotators are more inclined to classify a text as ironic when it includes a negative sentiment, while models trained on data annotated by the youngest annotators are particularly influenced by words related to immoral behaviors. Warning: This paper could contain content that is offensive or upsetting for the reader.
KW - Irony Detection
KW - Irony Interpretation
KW - Linguistic Analysis
KW - Perspectivism
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85175349805
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85175349805
SN - 1613-0073
VL - 3494
JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Y2 - 30 September 2023 through 30 September 2023
ER -