Dialogues between academics and practitioners: the role of generative dialogic encounters

N Beech, R MacIntosh, D MacLean

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    88 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper we seek to show how aspects of the thinking underpinning the relevance debate can be self-defeating. We consider the relationship between academics and practitioners from a dialogic perspective and perform a textual analysis of the ways in which 'pro-relevance' academics write about research. We use role analysis techniques to highlight the potential for mismatched expectations between academics and practitioners, and then consider an illustrative dialogue between practitioners and academics to develop our view that relevance has its roots in generative dialogic encounters. We conceptualize a modified view of dialogue in the context of organizational research relationships, which we believe offers a useful starting point for co-production of knowledge and understanding.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1341 - 1367
    JournalOrganization Studies
    Volume31
    Issue number9-10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • dialogue
    • relevance
    • practice
    • MANAGEMENT
    • co-production
    • management research

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dialogues between academics and practitioners: the role of generative dialogic encounters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this