Destabilizing Social Communication Theory

Colin B. Grant

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    An interaction paradigm continues to predominate in social communication models to this day and yet often tends to be heavily intuitive, epistemologically conservative und acritical. This article seeks to examine some of the implications for our intuitive understanding of interaction when greater instability is introduced into social communication theory where communication is conceptualized as a complex uncertainty. The theoretical architecture of this undertaking is in itself interdisciplinary, comprising concepts from the fields of social theory, logic, information theory and constructivism. In these interdisciplinary considerations, interaction is conceptualized as a fictional construction and thus disabused of the strong transcendental claims which accompany concepts of dialogism, consensus or intersubjectivity. Whereas uncertainty is customarily seen as the opposite of rational inclusive communication and a risk to be somehow avoided, this article explores a different theoretical modelling of the relationship between uncertainty and social communication. Here, communication is conceived as an extremely precarious undertaking. This very precariousness is a fact of everyday life where communication is social construction in progress and norms are constantly regenerated, negotiated and challenged.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)95-119+154
    JournalTheory, Culture and Society
    Volume20
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003

    Fingerprint

    communication theory
    communication
    uncertainty
    interaction
    precariousness
    intersubjectivity
    information theory
    constructivism
    social construction
    everyday life
    paradigm

    Keywords

    • Constructivism
    • Interaction theory
    • Social fictions
    • Uncertainty
    • Vagueness

    Cite this

    Grant, Colin B. / Destabilizing Social Communication Theory. In: Theory, Culture and Society. 2003 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 95-119+154.
    @article{4f8da71d90064b34b2f372ab4196d723,
    title = "Destabilizing Social Communication Theory",
    abstract = "An interaction paradigm continues to predominate in social communication models to this day and yet often tends to be heavily intuitive, epistemologically conservative und acritical. This article seeks to examine some of the implications for our intuitive understanding of interaction when greater instability is introduced into social communication theory where communication is conceptualized as a complex uncertainty. The theoretical architecture of this undertaking is in itself interdisciplinary, comprising concepts from the fields of social theory, logic, information theory and constructivism. In these interdisciplinary considerations, interaction is conceptualized as a fictional construction and thus disabused of the strong transcendental claims which accompany concepts of dialogism, consensus or intersubjectivity. Whereas uncertainty is customarily seen as the opposite of rational inclusive communication and a risk to be somehow avoided, this article explores a different theoretical modelling of the relationship between uncertainty and social communication. Here, communication is conceived as an extremely precarious undertaking. This very precariousness is a fact of everyday life where communication is social construction in progress and norms are constantly regenerated, negotiated and challenged.",
    keywords = "Constructivism, Interaction theory, Social fictions, Uncertainty, Vagueness",
    author = "Grant, {Colin B.}",
    year = "2003",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1177/0263276403206005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "95--119+154",
    journal = "Theory, Culture and Society",
    issn = "0263-2764",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "6",

    }

    Destabilizing Social Communication Theory. / Grant, Colin B.

    In: Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 20, No. 6, 12.2003, p. 95-119+154.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Destabilizing Social Communication Theory

    AU - Grant, Colin B.

    PY - 2003/12

    Y1 - 2003/12

    N2 - An interaction paradigm continues to predominate in social communication models to this day and yet often tends to be heavily intuitive, epistemologically conservative und acritical. This article seeks to examine some of the implications for our intuitive understanding of interaction when greater instability is introduced into social communication theory where communication is conceptualized as a complex uncertainty. The theoretical architecture of this undertaking is in itself interdisciplinary, comprising concepts from the fields of social theory, logic, information theory and constructivism. In these interdisciplinary considerations, interaction is conceptualized as a fictional construction and thus disabused of the strong transcendental claims which accompany concepts of dialogism, consensus or intersubjectivity. Whereas uncertainty is customarily seen as the opposite of rational inclusive communication and a risk to be somehow avoided, this article explores a different theoretical modelling of the relationship between uncertainty and social communication. Here, communication is conceived as an extremely precarious undertaking. This very precariousness is a fact of everyday life where communication is social construction in progress and norms are constantly regenerated, negotiated and challenged.

    AB - An interaction paradigm continues to predominate in social communication models to this day and yet often tends to be heavily intuitive, epistemologically conservative und acritical. This article seeks to examine some of the implications for our intuitive understanding of interaction when greater instability is introduced into social communication theory where communication is conceptualized as a complex uncertainty. The theoretical architecture of this undertaking is in itself interdisciplinary, comprising concepts from the fields of social theory, logic, information theory and constructivism. In these interdisciplinary considerations, interaction is conceptualized as a fictional construction and thus disabused of the strong transcendental claims which accompany concepts of dialogism, consensus or intersubjectivity. Whereas uncertainty is customarily seen as the opposite of rational inclusive communication and a risk to be somehow avoided, this article explores a different theoretical modelling of the relationship between uncertainty and social communication. Here, communication is conceived as an extremely precarious undertaking. This very precariousness is a fact of everyday life where communication is social construction in progress and norms are constantly regenerated, negotiated and challenged.

    KW - Constructivism

    KW - Interaction theory

    KW - Social fictions

    KW - Uncertainty

    KW - Vagueness

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346339778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0263276403206005

    DO - 10.1177/0263276403206005

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 95-119+154

    JO - Theory, Culture and Society

    JF - Theory, Culture and Society

    SN - 0263-2764

    IS - 6

    ER -