Designing quick & dirty applications for mobiles: Making the case for the utility of HCI principles

Lynne Baillie, Lee Morton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many applications are currently being built for mobile phones that are intended as throwaway gimmicks that people download from places like Apple Appstore. Users can download small throwaway applications for their mobile phone for as little as ninety nine cents. We were interested in what effect these two components e.g. throwaway and cheapness have on the use of HCI guidelines by the designers of these applications and whether or not it was worth their while incorporating them into their design given the temporary nature of use. In this paper we describe how we tested two designs of the same concept. The first design brief was company-led and did not explicitly adhere to any HCI principles and the second was designed according to HCI principles. We tested both applications with users in the field to see which was the simplest and most intuitive to use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-107
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Computing and Information Technology
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Human computer interaction
Mobile phones
Lead
Industry

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Mobile application
  • Throwaway application
  • Usability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

@article{fb8befde0ba443daa0157cb21841409c,
title = "Designing quick & dirty applications for mobiles: Making the case for the utility of HCI principles",
abstract = "Many applications are currently being built for mobile phones that are intended as throwaway gimmicks that people download from places like Apple Appstore. Users can download small throwaway applications for their mobile phone for as little as ninety nine cents. We were interested in what effect these two components e.g. throwaway and cheapness have on the use of HCI guidelines by the designers of these applications and whether or not it was worth their while incorporating them into their design given the temporary nature of use. In this paper we describe how we tested two designs of the same concept. The first design brief was company-led and did not explicitly adhere to any HCI principles and the second was designed according to HCI principles. We tested both applications with users in the field to see which was the simplest and most intuitive to use.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Mobile application, Throwaway application, Usability",
author = "Lynne Baillie and Lee Morton",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.2498/cit.1001810",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "103--107",
journal = "Journal of Computing and Information Technology",
issn = "1330-1136",
publisher = "The University of Zagreb Computing Centre (SRCE)",
number = "2",

}

Designing quick & dirty applications for mobiles : Making the case for the utility of HCI principles. / Baillie, Lynne; Morton, Lee.

In: Journal of Computing and Information Technology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2010, p. 103-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing quick & dirty applications for mobiles

T2 - Making the case for the utility of HCI principles

AU - Baillie, Lynne

AU - Morton, Lee

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Many applications are currently being built for mobile phones that are intended as throwaway gimmicks that people download from places like Apple Appstore. Users can download small throwaway applications for their mobile phone for as little as ninety nine cents. We were interested in what effect these two components e.g. throwaway and cheapness have on the use of HCI guidelines by the designers of these applications and whether or not it was worth their while incorporating them into their design given the temporary nature of use. In this paper we describe how we tested two designs of the same concept. The first design brief was company-led and did not explicitly adhere to any HCI principles and the second was designed according to HCI principles. We tested both applications with users in the field to see which was the simplest and most intuitive to use.

AB - Many applications are currently being built for mobile phones that are intended as throwaway gimmicks that people download from places like Apple Appstore. Users can download small throwaway applications for their mobile phone for as little as ninety nine cents. We were interested in what effect these two components e.g. throwaway and cheapness have on the use of HCI guidelines by the designers of these applications and whether or not it was worth their while incorporating them into their design given the temporary nature of use. In this paper we describe how we tested two designs of the same concept. The first design brief was company-led and did not explicitly adhere to any HCI principles and the second was designed according to HCI principles. We tested both applications with users in the field to see which was the simplest and most intuitive to use.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Mobile application

KW - Throwaway application

KW - Usability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040604935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2498/cit.1001810

DO - 10.2498/cit.1001810

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040604935

VL - 18

SP - 103

EP - 107

JO - Journal of Computing and Information Technology

JF - Journal of Computing and Information Technology

SN - 1330-1136

IS - 2

ER -