TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and validation of a multi-task, multi-context protocol for real-world gait simulation
AU - Scott, Kirsty
AU - Bonci, Tecla
AU - Salis, Francesca
AU - Alcock, Lisa
AU - Buckley, Ellen
AU - Gazit, Eran
AU - Hansen, Clint
AU - Schwickert, Lars
AU - Aminian, Kamiar
AU - Bertuletti, Stefano
AU - Caruso, Marco
AU - Chiari, Lorenzo
AU - Sharrack, Basil
AU - Maetzler, Walter
AU - Becker, Clemens
AU - Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
AU - Vogiatzis, Ioannis
AU - Brown, Philip
AU - Del Din, Silvia
AU - Eskofier, Björn
AU - Paraschiv-Ionescu, Anisoara
AU - Keogh, Alison
AU - Kirk, Cameron
AU - Kluge, Felix
AU - Micó-Amigo, Encarna
AU - Mueller, Arne
AU - Neatrour, Isabel
AU - Niessen, Martijn
AU - Palmerini, Luca
AU - Sillen, Henrik
AU - Singleton, David
AU - Ullrich, Martin
AU - Vereijken, Beatrix
AU - Froehlich, Marcel
AU - Brittain, Gavin
AU - Caulfield, Brian
AU - Koch, Sarah
AU - Carsin, Anne-Elie
AU - Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
AU - Kuederle, Arne
AU - Yarnall, Alison J.
AU - Rochester, Lynn
AU - Cereatti, Andrea
AU - Mazzà, Claudia
AU - Mobilise-D consortium
N1 - © 2022. Crown.
PY - 2022/12/16
Y1 - 2022/12/16
N2 - BackgroundMeasuring mobility in daily life entails dealing with confounding factors arising from multiple sources, including pathological characteristics, patient specific walking strategies, environment/context, and purpose of the task. The primary aim of this study is to propose and validate a protocol for simulating real-world gait accounting for all these factors within a single set of observations, while ensuring minimisation of participant burden and safety.MethodsThe protocol included eight motor tasks at varying speed, incline/steps, surface, path shape, cognitive demand, and included postures that may abruptly alter the participants’ strategy of walking. It was deployed in a convenience sample of 108 participants recruited from six cohorts that included older healthy adults (HA) and participants with potentially altered mobility due to Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), proximal femoral fracture (PFF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or congestive heart failure (CHF). A novelty introduced in the protocol was the tiered approach to increase difficulty both within the same task (e.g., by allowing use of aids or armrests) and across tasks.ResultsThe protocol proved to be safe and feasible (all participants could complete it and no adverse events were recorded) and the addition of the more complex tasks allowed a much greater spread in walking speeds to be achieved compared to standard straight walking trials. Furthermore, it allowed a representation of a variety of daily life relevant mobility aspects and can therefore be used for the validation of monitoring devices used in real life.ConclusionsThe protocol allowed for measuring gait in a variety of pathological conditions suggests that it can also be used to detect changes in gait due to, for example, the onset or progression of a disease, or due to therapy.Trial registration: ISRCTN—12246987.
AB - BackgroundMeasuring mobility in daily life entails dealing with confounding factors arising from multiple sources, including pathological characteristics, patient specific walking strategies, environment/context, and purpose of the task. The primary aim of this study is to propose and validate a protocol for simulating real-world gait accounting for all these factors within a single set of observations, while ensuring minimisation of participant burden and safety.MethodsThe protocol included eight motor tasks at varying speed, incline/steps, surface, path shape, cognitive demand, and included postures that may abruptly alter the participants’ strategy of walking. It was deployed in a convenience sample of 108 participants recruited from six cohorts that included older healthy adults (HA) and participants with potentially altered mobility due to Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), proximal femoral fracture (PFF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or congestive heart failure (CHF). A novelty introduced in the protocol was the tiered approach to increase difficulty both within the same task (e.g., by allowing use of aids or armrests) and across tasks.ResultsThe protocol proved to be safe and feasible (all participants could complete it and no adverse events were recorded) and the addition of the more complex tasks allowed a much greater spread in walking speeds to be achieved compared to standard straight walking trials. Furthermore, it allowed a representation of a variety of daily life relevant mobility aspects and can therefore be used for the validation of monitoring devices used in real life.ConclusionsThe protocol allowed for measuring gait in a variety of pathological conditions suggests that it can also be used to detect changes in gait due to, for example, the onset or progression of a disease, or due to therapy.Trial registration: ISRCTN—12246987.
KW - Adult
KW - Humans
KW - Gait
KW - Walking
KW - Walking Speed
KW - Parkinson Disease
KW - Research Design
KW - Digital mobility outcomes
KW - Technical validation
KW - Wearable sensors
KW - Neurological diseases
KW - Mobility monitoring
U2 - 10.1186/s12984-022-01116-1
DO - 10.1186/s12984-022-01116-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 36522646
SN - 1743-0003
VL - 19
JO - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
M1 - 141
ER -