Defining and improving technology transfer business and management processes in university innovation centres

Rodney McAdam, William Keogh, Brendan Galbraith, Don Laurie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    63 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The complex and dynamic behaviour associated with technology transfer business processes combined with the technological risk involved in the participating small firms, has led to a lack of business process definition and improvement in this area. Furthermore, the embryonic firms are highly individualistic with differing needs for assistance and development. There may also be a tendency to provide infrastructure and basic services with an avoidance of business process definition and hence, improvement. The aim of this paper is to investigate how potential business and management inputs can be used to define and to suggest improvements for two key technology transfer business processes, namely the technology licensing process and the business building process. A stratified pathway process mapping approach is used. This research approach includes semi-structured interviews with University Innovation Centre small firms, focus groups with Innovation Centre stakeholders and best practice benchmarking. The findings indicate that a modified processual approach can be adopted to define key business processes within technology transfer. Using this approach it is possible to show where business and management interventions can most effectively be deployed in each process. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1418-1429
    Number of pages12
    JournalTechnovation
    Volume25
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

    Keywords

    • Business processes
    • High technology small firms
    • Innovation
    • Innovation centres
    • University science parks

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Defining and improving technology transfer business and management processes in university innovation centres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this