TY - JOUR
T1 - Data Quality Influences the Predicted Distribution and Habitat of Four Southern-Hemisphere Albatross Species
AU - Goetz, Kimberly T.
AU - Stephenson, Fabrice
AU - Hoskins, Andrew
AU - Bindoff, Aidan D.
AU - Orben, Rachael A.
AU - Sagar, Paul M.
AU - Torres, Leigh G.
AU - Kroeger, Caitlin E.
AU - Sztukowski, Lisa A.
AU - Phillips, Richard A.
AU - Votier, Stephen C.
AU - Bearhop, Stuart
AU - Taylor, Graeme A.
AU - Thompson, David R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the Innovation Fund of the Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge, the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment, the New Zealand Department of Conservation, and by the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd.
Funding Information:
Many thanks to Josh London and Elliott Hazen for the support and analysis guidance and to the many people involved in the logistics that resulted in the data used in this study. The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Marine Fisheries. Service, NOAA. Mention of trade names and commercial firms does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Goetz, Stephenson, Hoskins, Bindoff, Orben, Sagar, Torres, Kroeger, Sztukowski, Phillips, Votier, Bearhop, Taylor and Thompson.
PY - 2022/5/18
Y1 - 2022/5/18
N2 - Few studies have assessed the influence of data quality on the predicted probability of occurrence and preferred habitat of marine predators. We compared results from four species distribution models (SDMs) for four southern-hemisphere albatross species, Buller’s (Thalassarche bulleri), Campbell (T. impavida), grey-headed (T. chrysostoma), and white-capped (T. steadi), based on datasets of differing quality, ranging from no location data to twice-daily locations of individual birds collected by geolocation devices. Two relative environmental suitability (RES) models were fit using minimum and maximum preferred and absolute values for each environmental variable based on (1) monthly 50% kernel density contours and background environmental data, and (2) primary literature or expert opinion. Additionally, two boosted regression tree (BRT) models were fit using (1) opportunistic sightings data, and (2) geolocation data from bird-borne electronic tags. Using model-specific threshold values, habitat was quantified for each species and model. Model variables included distance from land, bathymetry, sea surface temperature, and chlorophyll-a concentration. Results from both RES models and the BRT model fit with opportunistic sightings were compared to those from the BRT model fit using geolocation data to assess the influence of data quality on predicted occupancy and habitat. For all species, BRT models outperformed RES models. BRT models offer a predictive advantage over RES models by being able to identify relevant variables, incorporate environmental interactions, and provide spatially explicit estimates of model uncertainty. RES models resulted in larger, less refined areas of predicted habitat for all species. Our study highlights the importance of data quality in predicting the distribution and habitat of albatrosses and emphasises the need to consider the pros and cons associated with different levels of data quality when using SDMs to inform management decisions. Furthermore, we examine the overlap in preferred habitat predicted by each SDM with fishing effort. We discuss the influence of data quality on predicting the wide-scale distributions of pelagic seabirds and how these impacts could result in different protection measures.
AB - Few studies have assessed the influence of data quality on the predicted probability of occurrence and preferred habitat of marine predators. We compared results from four species distribution models (SDMs) for four southern-hemisphere albatross species, Buller’s (Thalassarche bulleri), Campbell (T. impavida), grey-headed (T. chrysostoma), and white-capped (T. steadi), based on datasets of differing quality, ranging from no location data to twice-daily locations of individual birds collected by geolocation devices. Two relative environmental suitability (RES) models were fit using minimum and maximum preferred and absolute values for each environmental variable based on (1) monthly 50% kernel density contours and background environmental data, and (2) primary literature or expert opinion. Additionally, two boosted regression tree (BRT) models were fit using (1) opportunistic sightings data, and (2) geolocation data from bird-borne electronic tags. Using model-specific threshold values, habitat was quantified for each species and model. Model variables included distance from land, bathymetry, sea surface temperature, and chlorophyll-a concentration. Results from both RES models and the BRT model fit with opportunistic sightings were compared to those from the BRT model fit using geolocation data to assess the influence of data quality on predicted occupancy and habitat. For all species, BRT models outperformed RES models. BRT models offer a predictive advantage over RES models by being able to identify relevant variables, incorporate environmental interactions, and provide spatially explicit estimates of model uncertainty. RES models resulted in larger, less refined areas of predicted habitat for all species. Our study highlights the importance of data quality in predicting the distribution and habitat of albatrosses and emphasises the need to consider the pros and cons associated with different levels of data quality when using SDMs to inform management decisions. Furthermore, we examine the overlap in preferred habitat predicted by each SDM with fishing effort. We discuss the influence of data quality on predicting the wide-scale distributions of pelagic seabirds and how these impacts could result in different protection measures.
KW - albatross
KW - biologging
KW - boosted regression tree
KW - geolocation
KW - habitat suitability
KW - relative environmental suitability
KW - seabird conservation
KW - species distribution models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131520372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2022.782923
DO - 10.3389/fmars.2022.782923
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85131520372
SN - 2296-7745
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Marine Science
JF - Frontiers in Marine Science
M1 - 782923
ER -