Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation

Evidence from finance directors

Seth Armitage, Claire Marston

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The majority view of the executives interviewed is that disclosure reduces the cost of equity up to the point at which a good-practice level of communication has been reached, after which there is little further effect. Greater disclosure to rating agencies and lenders reduces the cost of debt. Attitudes towards more mandatory disclosure are mostly negative. The main perceived cost of disclosure is creating the information. The main benefits are promotion of a reputation for openness and of shareholder confidence, not a lower cost of capital. We suggest that a reputation for openness is valued because it enhances the company's overall reputation, which brings commercial benefits. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)314-336
    Number of pages23
    JournalThe British Accounting Review
    Volume40
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008

    Fingerprint

    Corporate disclosure
    Cost of capital
    Finance
    Disclosure
    Openness
    Cost of equity
    Rating agencies
    Cost of debt
    Costs
    Confidence
    Communication
    Good practice
    Shareholders
    Mandatory disclosure

    Cite this

    Armitage, Seth ; Marston, Claire. / Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation : Evidence from finance directors. In: The British Accounting Review. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 314-336.
    @article{941b68fcf0694c7bb1b2b380091c9760,
    title = "Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation: Evidence from finance directors",
    abstract = "The majority view of the executives interviewed is that disclosure reduces the cost of equity up to the point at which a good-practice level of communication has been reached, after which there is little further effect. Greater disclosure to rating agencies and lenders reduces the cost of debt. Attitudes towards more mandatory disclosure are mostly negative. The main perceived cost of disclosure is creating the information. The main benefits are promotion of a reputation for openness and of shareholder confidence, not a lower cost of capital. We suggest that a reputation for openness is valued because it enhances the company's overall reputation, which brings commercial benefits. {\circledC} 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
    author = "Seth Armitage and Claire Marston",
    year = "2008",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "40",
    pages = "314--336",
    journal = "The British Accounting Review",
    issn = "0890-8389",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation : Evidence from finance directors. / Armitage, Seth; Marston, Claire.

    In: The British Accounting Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 314-336.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation

    T2 - Evidence from finance directors

    AU - Armitage, Seth

    AU - Marston, Claire

    PY - 2008/12

    Y1 - 2008/12

    N2 - The majority view of the executives interviewed is that disclosure reduces the cost of equity up to the point at which a good-practice level of communication has been reached, after which there is little further effect. Greater disclosure to rating agencies and lenders reduces the cost of debt. Attitudes towards more mandatory disclosure are mostly negative. The main perceived cost of disclosure is creating the information. The main benefits are promotion of a reputation for openness and of shareholder confidence, not a lower cost of capital. We suggest that a reputation for openness is valued because it enhances the company's overall reputation, which brings commercial benefits. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    AB - The majority view of the executives interviewed is that disclosure reduces the cost of equity up to the point at which a good-practice level of communication has been reached, after which there is little further effect. Greater disclosure to rating agencies and lenders reduces the cost of debt. Attitudes towards more mandatory disclosure are mostly negative. The main perceived cost of disclosure is creating the information. The main benefits are promotion of a reputation for openness and of shareholder confidence, not a lower cost of capital. We suggest that a reputation for openness is valued because it enhances the company's overall reputation, which brings commercial benefits. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 40

    SP - 314

    EP - 336

    JO - The British Accounting Review

    JF - The British Accounting Review

    SN - 0890-8389

    IS - 4

    ER -