Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory

Annette Hastings, Nick Bailey, Maria Gannon, Kirsten Besemer, Glen Bramley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The scale of the cuts to local government finance, coupled with increasing demand for services, has led to unprecedented ‘budget gaps’ in council budgets. Arguably, two competing narratives of the trajectory of local government have emerged in which contrasting futures are imagined for the sector – a positive story of adaptation and survival and more negative one of residualisation and marginalisation. Drawing on case study evidence from three English local authorities, the paper distinguishes and provides examples of three strategic approaches to managing austerity – efficiency, retrenchment and investment. It demonstrates how and why the balance of these strategies has shifted between the early and later phases of austerity and considers the extent to which the evidence of the case studies provide support for either the survival or marginalisation narrative. The paper concludes by arguing that a third narrative – responsibilisation – captures more fully the trajectory of local government in England.

LanguageEnglish
Pages601-621
Number of pages21
JournalLocal Government Studies
Volume41
Issue number4
Early online date29 Apr 2015
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

local government
coping
marginalization
narrative
budget
trajectory
management
strategic approach
finance
evidence
efficiency
demand
services
local authority

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Hastings, Annette ; Bailey, Nick ; Gannon, Maria ; Besemer, Kirsten ; Bramley, Glen. / Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory. In: Local Government Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 601-621
@article{be0d4e9cd42a42c49a604a8a5643af9a,
title = "Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory",
abstract = "The scale of the cuts to local government finance, coupled with increasing demand for services, has led to unprecedented ‘budget gaps’ in council budgets. Arguably, two competing narratives of the trajectory of local government have emerged in which contrasting futures are imagined for the sector – a positive story of adaptation and survival and more negative one of residualisation and marginalisation. Drawing on case study evidence from three English local authorities, the paper distinguishes and provides examples of three strategic approaches to managing austerity – efficiency, retrenchment and investment. It demonstrates how and why the balance of these strategies has shifted between the early and later phases of austerity and considers the extent to which the evidence of the case studies provide support for either the survival or marginalisation narrative. The paper concludes by arguing that a third narrative – responsibilisation – captures more fully the trajectory of local government in England.",
author = "Annette Hastings and Nick Bailey and Maria Gannon and Kirsten Besemer and Glen Bramley",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/03003930.2015.1036987",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "601--621",
journal = "Local Government Studies",
issn = "0300-3930",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory. / Hastings, Annette; Bailey, Nick; Gannon, Maria; Besemer, Kirsten; Bramley, Glen.

In: Local Government Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2015, p. 601-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory

AU - Hastings,Annette

AU - Bailey,Nick

AU - Gannon,Maria

AU - Besemer,Kirsten

AU - Bramley,Glen

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The scale of the cuts to local government finance, coupled with increasing demand for services, has led to unprecedented ‘budget gaps’ in council budgets. Arguably, two competing narratives of the trajectory of local government have emerged in which contrasting futures are imagined for the sector – a positive story of adaptation and survival and more negative one of residualisation and marginalisation. Drawing on case study evidence from three English local authorities, the paper distinguishes and provides examples of three strategic approaches to managing austerity – efficiency, retrenchment and investment. It demonstrates how and why the balance of these strategies has shifted between the early and later phases of austerity and considers the extent to which the evidence of the case studies provide support for either the survival or marginalisation narrative. The paper concludes by arguing that a third narrative – responsibilisation – captures more fully the trajectory of local government in England.

AB - The scale of the cuts to local government finance, coupled with increasing demand for services, has led to unprecedented ‘budget gaps’ in council budgets. Arguably, two competing narratives of the trajectory of local government have emerged in which contrasting futures are imagined for the sector – a positive story of adaptation and survival and more negative one of residualisation and marginalisation. Drawing on case study evidence from three English local authorities, the paper distinguishes and provides examples of three strategic approaches to managing austerity – efficiency, retrenchment and investment. It demonstrates how and why the balance of these strategies has shifted between the early and later phases of austerity and considers the extent to which the evidence of the case studies provide support for either the survival or marginalisation narrative. The paper concludes by arguing that a third narrative – responsibilisation – captures more fully the trajectory of local government in England.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928691746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03003930.2015.1036987

DO - 10.1080/03003930.2015.1036987

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 601

EP - 621

JO - Local Government Studies

T2 - Local Government Studies

JF - Local Government Studies

SN - 0300-3930

IS - 4

ER -