Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion

Petros Wallden*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


The best developed formulation of closed system quantum theory that handles multiple-time statements, is the consistent (or decoherent) histories approach. The most important weaknesses of the approach is that it gives rise to many different consistent sets, and it has been argued that a complete interpretation should be accompanied with a natural mechanism leading to a (possibly) unique preferred consistent set. The existence of multiple consistent sets becomes more problematic because it allows the existence of contrary inferences [1]. We analyse the conceptual difficulties that arise from the existence of multiple consistent sets and provide a suggestion for a natural set selection criterion. This criterion does not lead to a unique physical consistent set, however it evades the existence of consistent sets with contrary inferences. The criterion is based on the concept of preclusion and the requirement that probability one propositions and their inferences should be non-contextual. The allowed consistent sets turn-out to be compatible with coevents which are the ontology of an alternative, histories based, formulation [2–4].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1195-1215
Number of pages21
JournalFoundations of Physics
Issue number11
Early online date4 Oct 2014
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014


  • Consistent histories
  • Contrary inferences
  • Decoherent histories


Dive into the research topics of 'Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this