TY - JOUR
T1 - Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media
AU - Zhao, Benzhong
AU - MacMinn, Christopher W.
AU - Primkulov, Bauyrzhan K.
AU - Chen, Yu
AU - Valocchi, Albert J.
AU - Zhao, Jianlin
AU - Kang, Qinjun
AU - Bruning, Kelsey
AU - McClure, James E.
AU - Miller, Cass T.
AU - Fakhari, Abbas
AU - Bolster, Diogo
AU - Hiller, Thomas
AU - Brinkmann, Martin
AU - Cueto-Felgueroso, Luis
AU - Cogswell, Daniel A.
AU - Verma, Rahul
AU - Prodanović, Maša
AU - Maes, Julien
AU - Geiger, Sebastian
AU - Vassvik, Morten
AU - Hansen, Alex
AU - Segre, Enrico
AU - Holtzman, Ran
AU - Yang, Zhibing
AU - Yuan, Chao
AU - Chareyre, Bruno
AU - Juanes, Ruben
PY - 2019/7/9
Y1 - 2019/7/9
N2 - Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.
AB - Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.
KW - Capillarity
KW - Pattern formation
KW - Porous media
KW - Simulation
KW - Wettability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068539209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1901619116
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1901619116
M3 - Article
C2 - 31227608
AN - SCOPUS:85068539209
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 116
SP - 13799
EP - 13806
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 28
ER -