Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Heriot-Watt Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Datasets
Impacts
Equipment
Prizes
Activities
Press/Media
Courses
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Comparison of immobilization strategies for Cryptosporidium parvum immunosensors
Despoina Gavriilidou,
Helen Bridle
School of Engineering & Physical Sciences
Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
10
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of immobilization strategies for Cryptosporidium parvum immunosensors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
INIS
comparative evaluations
100%
antibodies
100%
recovery
75%
proteins
75%
concentration
50%
detection
25%
design
25%
water
25%
industry
25%
capture
25%
monitoring
25%
performance
25%
efficiency
25%
operation
25%
chlorine
25%
sensors
25%
parasites
25%
doses
25%
disinfection
25%
Immunology and Microbiology
Cryptosporidium parvum
100%
Cryptosporidium
100%
Monospecific Antibody
50%
Protozoa
50%
Antibody Blood Level
50%
Infectious Dose
50%
Oocyst
50%
Immunoglobulin G Antibody
50%
Engineering
Convective
100%
Recovery Rate
100%
Static Condition
50%
Disinfection
50%
Capture Efficiency
50%
Biosensor
50%
Physisorption
50%
Food Science
Cryptosporidium
100%
Chemical Engineering
Physisorption
100%