Abstract
Accurate credit risk assessment is crucial for financial institutions to minimise loan defaults. This study proposes a vintage-based credit scoring framework that integrates individual repayment behaviour with vintage analysis and evaluates five machine learning models, including logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, stacking ensemble, and multilayer perceptron (MLP), for binary credit risk classification. Results show that ensemble methods, particularly random forest, achieve superior predictive performance with the highest F1-score (0.81), precision (0.87) and accuracy (0.96), while logistic regression exhibits high recall but low precision. The MLP shows good recall (0.79) and a competitive F1-score (0.77), making it suitable for prioritising high-risk borrower detection, although it lacks interpretability. Overall, the study highlights the trade-offs between predictive performance and interpretability, emphasising the potential of vintage-based approaches and ensemble learning for practical credit scoring applications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 32-54 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Dec 2025 |
Keywords
- Binary Classification
- Credit Risk Scoring
- Ensemble Learning
- Machine Learning
- Vintage Analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Vintage-Based Credit Scoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver