Characterising Local Knowledge across the Flood Risk Management Cycle: A Case Study of Southern Malawi

Robert Sakic Trogrlic, Grant B. Wright, Melanie J. Duncan, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Adebayo J. Adeloye, Faidess Dumbizgani Mwale, Joyce Mwafulirwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

People possess a creative set of strategies based on their local knowledge (LK) that allow them to stay in flood-prone areas. Stakeholders involved with local level flood risk management (FRM) often overlook and underutilise this LK. There is thus an increasing need for its identification, documentation and assessment. Based on qualitative research, this paper critically explores the notion of LK in Malawi. Data was collected through 15 focus group discussions, 36 interviews and field observation, and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that local communities have a complex knowledge system that cuts across different stages of the FRM cycle and forms a component of community resilience. LK is not homogenous within a community, and is highly dependent on the social and political contexts. Access to LK is not equally available to everyone, conditioned by the access to resources and underlying causes of vulnerability that are outside communities’ influence. There are also limits to LK; it is impacted by exogenous processes (e.g., environmental degradation, climate change) that are changing the nature of flooding at local levels, rendering LK, which is based on historical observations, less relevant. It is dynamic and informally triangulated with scientific knowledge brought about by development partners. This paper offers valuable insights for FRM stakeholders as to how to consider LK in their approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1681
JournalSustainability
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

traditional knowledge
Malawi
Risk management
risk management
natural disaster
community
stakeholder
Weathering
environmental damage
Climate change
group discussion
resilience
knowledge
documentation
qualitative research
vulnerability
climate change
cause
environmental degradation
interview

Keywords

  • Community-based disaster risk reduction
  • Disaster risk reduction
  • Early action
  • Early warning
  • Flood risk management
  • Local knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Sakic Trogrlic, Robert ; Wright, Grant B. ; Duncan, Melanie J. ; van den Homberg, Marc J. C. ; Adeloye, Adebayo J. ; Mwale, Faidess Dumbizgani ; Mwafulirwa, Joyce. / Characterising Local Knowledge across the Flood Risk Management Cycle: A Case Study of Southern Malawi. In: Sustainability. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 6.
@article{94bdeffcd29345f9bfc3c2c3fb2dcccb,
title = "Characterising Local Knowledge across the Flood Risk Management Cycle: A Case Study of Southern Malawi",
abstract = "People possess a creative set of strategies based on their local knowledge (LK) that allow them to stay in flood-prone areas. Stakeholders involved with local level flood risk management (FRM) often overlook and underutilise this LK. There is thus an increasing need for its identification, documentation and assessment. Based on qualitative research, this paper critically explores the notion of LK in Malawi. Data was collected through 15 focus group discussions, 36 interviews and field observation, and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that local communities have a complex knowledge system that cuts across different stages of the FRM cycle and forms a component of community resilience. LK is not homogenous within a community, and is highly dependent on the social and political contexts. Access to LK is not equally available to everyone, conditioned by the access to resources and underlying causes of vulnerability that are outside communities’ influence. There are also limits to LK; it is impacted by exogenous processes (e.g., environmental degradation, climate change) that are changing the nature of flooding at local levels, rendering LK, which is based on historical observations, less relevant. It is dynamic and informally triangulated with scientific knowledge brought about by development partners. This paper offers valuable insights for FRM stakeholders as to how to consider LK in their approaches.",
keywords = "Community-based disaster risk reduction, Disaster risk reduction, Early action, Early warning, Flood risk management, Local knowledge",
author = "{Sakic Trogrlic}, Robert and Wright, {Grant B.} and Duncan, {Melanie J.} and {van den Homberg}, {Marc J. C.} and Adeloye, {Adebayo J.} and Mwale, {Faidess Dumbizgani} and Joyce Mwafulirwa",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3390/su11061681",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "6",

}

Characterising Local Knowledge across the Flood Risk Management Cycle: A Case Study of Southern Malawi. / Sakic Trogrlic, Robert; Wright, Grant B.; Duncan, Melanie J.; van den Homberg, Marc J. C.; Adeloye, Adebayo J.; Mwale, Faidess Dumbizgani; Mwafulirwa, Joyce.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 6, 1681, 20.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterising Local Knowledge across the Flood Risk Management Cycle: A Case Study of Southern Malawi

AU - Sakic Trogrlic, Robert

AU - Wright, Grant B.

AU - Duncan, Melanie J.

AU - van den Homberg, Marc J. C.

AU - Adeloye, Adebayo J.

AU - Mwale, Faidess Dumbizgani

AU - Mwafulirwa, Joyce

PY - 2019/3/20

Y1 - 2019/3/20

N2 - People possess a creative set of strategies based on their local knowledge (LK) that allow them to stay in flood-prone areas. Stakeholders involved with local level flood risk management (FRM) often overlook and underutilise this LK. There is thus an increasing need for its identification, documentation and assessment. Based on qualitative research, this paper critically explores the notion of LK in Malawi. Data was collected through 15 focus group discussions, 36 interviews and field observation, and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that local communities have a complex knowledge system that cuts across different stages of the FRM cycle and forms a component of community resilience. LK is not homogenous within a community, and is highly dependent on the social and political contexts. Access to LK is not equally available to everyone, conditioned by the access to resources and underlying causes of vulnerability that are outside communities’ influence. There are also limits to LK; it is impacted by exogenous processes (e.g., environmental degradation, climate change) that are changing the nature of flooding at local levels, rendering LK, which is based on historical observations, less relevant. It is dynamic and informally triangulated with scientific knowledge brought about by development partners. This paper offers valuable insights for FRM stakeholders as to how to consider LK in their approaches.

AB - People possess a creative set of strategies based on their local knowledge (LK) that allow them to stay in flood-prone areas. Stakeholders involved with local level flood risk management (FRM) often overlook and underutilise this LK. There is thus an increasing need for its identification, documentation and assessment. Based on qualitative research, this paper critically explores the notion of LK in Malawi. Data was collected through 15 focus group discussions, 36 interviews and field observation, and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that local communities have a complex knowledge system that cuts across different stages of the FRM cycle and forms a component of community resilience. LK is not homogenous within a community, and is highly dependent on the social and political contexts. Access to LK is not equally available to everyone, conditioned by the access to resources and underlying causes of vulnerability that are outside communities’ influence. There are also limits to LK; it is impacted by exogenous processes (e.g., environmental degradation, climate change) that are changing the nature of flooding at local levels, rendering LK, which is based on historical observations, less relevant. It is dynamic and informally triangulated with scientific knowledge brought about by development partners. This paper offers valuable insights for FRM stakeholders as to how to consider LK in their approaches.

KW - Community-based disaster risk reduction

KW - Disaster risk reduction

KW - Early action

KW - Early warning

KW - Flood risk management

KW - Local knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063539763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su11061681

DO - 10.3390/su11061681

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 6

M1 - 1681

ER -