Abstract
Changing trends in governance have contributed to the development of 'capacity-building initiatives' in the third sector to enable them to take a greater role in partnership approaches, service delivery and social entrepreneurship. However, analysts have argued that such initiatives are more likely to serve the interests of professionalised welfare groups rather than engage with communities' own skills and interests. Drawing on in-depth individual interviews and case studies with those engaged in such activities in minority ethnic organisations in devolved Scotland, this paper reveals that 'capacity' is a socially constructed, negotiated process, which benefits some organisations more than others. We identify factors which are likely to either facilitate or hinder the process. While there is consensus among participants that such activities play a useful role in developing organisational capacity, we argue that the responsibility for addressing structural factors including socio-economic disadvantage and racism remains with government.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 245-61 |
| Journal | Policy and Politics |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 21 Mar 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- capacity building
- voluntary organisations
- active citizenship
- minority ethnic
- partnerships
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Capacity building in the minority ethnic voluntary sector: for whom, how and for what purpose?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver