TY - JOUR
T1 - Bowland Shale well placement strategy – Part 1: Determining landing intervals using geomechanical properties
AU - Anderson, Iain
AU - Ma, Jingsheng
AU - Wu, Xiaoyang
AU - Stow, Dorrik
AU - Griffiths, David
N1 - Funding Information:
Iain Anderson acknowledges the support of a James Watt Scholarship from Heriot-Watt University (HWU) and the receipt of a British University Funding Initiative (BUFI) studentship award (grant number GA/16S/024 ) from the British Geological Survey (BGS), which provides the funding for the PhD project upon which this work is based. The PhD forms part of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Oil and Gas (grant number NE/M00578X/1 ). The BGS is thanked for providing access to well data and Schlumberger are thanked for the provision of Techlog software under academic license to HWU. Jingsheng Ma acknowledges NERC grant number NE/R018022/1 for financial support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - The production performance of a shale reservoir is directly affected by the geomechanical characteristics of the formation. A target shale interval will ideally develop hydraulic fractures upon stimulation that stay open with the aid of injected proppant. However, shales are geomechanically complex due to heterogeneities in their rock properties such as mineralogy and porosity and the extent to which they may be naturally fractured. These characteristics can complicate the task of identifying the ideal target interval for placing horizontal wells. Whilst the Bowland Shale is the UK's most prospective shale gas target, long horizontal wells are generally not feasible or practical in the Craven Basin, due to the existence of many, large-offset reverse faults and high bedding dips. An alternative to this approach could include drilling shorter, stacked horizontal wells targeting different stratigraphic intervals. However, it is unclear if there are enough intervals within the stratigraphic section with the desired geomechanical properties to target with stacked horizontal wells, nor if there are adequate intervals that can limit vertical hydraulic fracture growth between those wells. The absence of the latter may ultimately lead to well interference and reduced production. These issues were addressed by the creation of a series of wireline log-based geomechanical logs at well Preese Hall-1, calibrated to pressure test data. Aided by the results of a cluster analysis model, the upper section of the Bowland Shale was classified into geomechanical zones to identify the optimal intervals for hydraulic fracturing and barriers to vertical hydraulic fracture growth. Three intervals are highlighted with low effective stress, low fracture toughness and high brittleness which may form excellent landing zones. Importantly, these landing zones are also separated by intervals of high effective stress that may limit vertical hydraulic fracture growth and mitigate the risk of well interference.
AB - The production performance of a shale reservoir is directly affected by the geomechanical characteristics of the formation. A target shale interval will ideally develop hydraulic fractures upon stimulation that stay open with the aid of injected proppant. However, shales are geomechanically complex due to heterogeneities in their rock properties such as mineralogy and porosity and the extent to which they may be naturally fractured. These characteristics can complicate the task of identifying the ideal target interval for placing horizontal wells. Whilst the Bowland Shale is the UK's most prospective shale gas target, long horizontal wells are generally not feasible or practical in the Craven Basin, due to the existence of many, large-offset reverse faults and high bedding dips. An alternative to this approach could include drilling shorter, stacked horizontal wells targeting different stratigraphic intervals. However, it is unclear if there are enough intervals within the stratigraphic section with the desired geomechanical properties to target with stacked horizontal wells, nor if there are adequate intervals that can limit vertical hydraulic fracture growth between those wells. The absence of the latter may ultimately lead to well interference and reduced production. These issues were addressed by the creation of a series of wireline log-based geomechanical logs at well Preese Hall-1, calibrated to pressure test data. Aided by the results of a cluster analysis model, the upper section of the Bowland Shale was classified into geomechanical zones to identify the optimal intervals for hydraulic fracturing and barriers to vertical hydraulic fracture growth. Three intervals are highlighted with low effective stress, low fracture toughness and high brittleness which may form excellent landing zones. Importantly, these landing zones are also separated by intervals of high effective stress that may limit vertical hydraulic fracture growth and mitigate the risk of well interference.
KW - Bowland shale
KW - Cluster analysis
KW - Geomechanics
KW - Hydraulic fracturing
KW - Landing zone
KW - Overpressure
KW - Wireline log
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113273917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105277
DO - 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105277
M3 - Article
SN - 0264-8172
VL - 133
JO - Marine and Petroleum Geology
JF - Marine and Petroleum Geology
M1 - 105277
ER -