Bottom-up effects of a no-take zone on endangered penguin demographics

Richard B. Sherley*, Henning Winker, Res Altwegg, Carl D. van der Lingen, Stephen C. Votier, Robert J. M. Crawford

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marine no-take zones can have positive impacts for target species and are increasingly important management tools. However, whether they indirectly benefit higher order predators remains unclear. The endangered African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) depends on commercially exploited forage fish. We examined how chick survival responded to an experimental 3-year fishery closure around Robben Island, South Africa, controlling for variation in prey biomass and fishery catches. Chick survival increased by 18% when the closure was initiated, which alone led to a predicted 27% higher population compared with continued fishing. However, the modelled population continued to decline, probably because of high adult mortality linked to poor prey availability over larger spatial scales. Our results illustrate that small no-take zones can have bottom-up benefits for highly mobile marine predators, but are only one component of holistic, ecosystem-based management regimes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20150237
JournalBiology Letters
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015

Keywords

  • Breeding success
  • Fisheries-seabird interactions
  • Fishing closures
  • Marine conservation
  • Marine protected areas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bottom-up effects of a no-take zone on endangered penguin demographics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this