Big data and ergonomics methods: A new paradigm for tackling strategic transport safety risks

Guy Walker*, Ailsa Strathie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)
193 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Big data collected from On-Train Data Recorders (OTDR) has the potential to address the most important strategic risks currently faced by rail operators and authorities worldwide. These risk issues are increasingly orientated around human performance and have proven resistant to existing approaches. This paper presents a number of proof of concept demonstrations to show that long standing ergonomics methods can be driven from big data, and succeed in providing insight into human performance in a novel way. Over 300 ergonomics methods were reviewed and a smaller sub-set selected for proof-of-concept development using real on-train recorder data. From this are derived nine candidate Human Factors Leading Indicators which map on to all of the psychological precursors of the identified risks. This approach has the potential to make use of a significantly underused source of data, and enable rail industry stakeholders to intervene sooner to address human performance issues that, via the methods presented in this paper, are clearly manifest in on-train data recordings. The intersection of psychological knowledge, ergonomics methods and big data creates an important new framework for driving new insights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298–311
Number of pages13
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume53
Issue numberPart B
Early online date6 Nov 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Big data
  • Human performance
  • Leading indicators
  • Methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Big data and ergonomics methods: A new paradigm for tackling strategic transport safety risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this