TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond green
T2 - Broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities
AU - Fischer, Leonie K.
AU - Honold, Jasmin
AU - Cvejić, Rozalija
AU - Delshammar, Tim
AU - Hilbert, Sven
AU - Lafortezza, Raffaele
AU - Nastran, Mojca
AU - Nielsen, Anders Busse
AU - Pintar, Marina
AU - van der Jagt, Alexander P. N.
AU - Kowarik, Ingo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was financed by the “Green Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity for Sustainable Urban Development and the Green Economy (GREEN SURGE)”, EU FP7 collaborative project , FP7-ENV.2013.6.2-5-603567 (Grant Agreement No. 603567). We thank Kelaine Ravdin and Yole DeBellis for improving our English, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - While urban growth contributes to the biodiversity crisis, biodiverse greenspaces within cities could support both human wellbeing and biodiversity conservation. Yet, urban greenspaces are under pressure due to the rapid densification of cities worldwide. Urban conservation policies thus need broad support, ideally from people with different sociocultural backgrounds. Whether urban residents prefer biodiverse over simply green spaces, however, largely remains an open question. We tested how diverse respondents (N = 3716) from five European cities valued three levels of biodiversity (plant species richness) in four ubiquitous greenspace types. Our field survey revealed that biodiversity matters: People largely prefer higher plant species richness in urban greenspaces (i.e., parks, wastelands, streetscapes) and agree that higher plant species richness allows for more liveable cities. Despite variation across European cities, positive valuations of high plant species richness prevailed among different sociocultural groups, including people of migrant background. The results of this study can thus support policies on a biodiversity-friendly development and management of urban greenspaces by highlighting social arguments for integrating biodiversity into urban development plans.
AB - While urban growth contributes to the biodiversity crisis, biodiverse greenspaces within cities could support both human wellbeing and biodiversity conservation. Yet, urban greenspaces are under pressure due to the rapid densification of cities worldwide. Urban conservation policies thus need broad support, ideally from people with different sociocultural backgrounds. Whether urban residents prefer biodiverse over simply green spaces, however, largely remains an open question. We tested how diverse respondents (N = 3716) from five European cities valued three levels of biodiversity (plant species richness) in four ubiquitous greenspace types. Our field survey revealed that biodiversity matters: People largely prefer higher plant species richness in urban greenspaces (i.e., parks, wastelands, streetscapes) and agree that higher plant species richness allows for more liveable cities. Despite variation across European cities, positive valuations of high plant species richness prevailed among different sociocultural groups, including people of migrant background. The results of this study can thus support policies on a biodiversity-friendly development and management of urban greenspaces by highlighting social arguments for integrating biodiversity into urban development plans.
KW - Biocultural diversity
KW - Environmental valuation
KW - Green cities
KW - Human wellbeing
KW - Migration background
KW - Urban nature
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044347119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044347119
SN - 0959-3780
VL - 49
SP - 35
EP - 45
JO - Global Environmental Change
JF - Global Environmental Change
ER -