Abstract
When memory is the only evidence in, for instance, a criminal trial, how is it to be evaluated? This article shows how everyday beliefs about memory often run counter to the scientific evidence and how they can mislead in legal settings. We argue that judges, jurors, barristers, solicitors, and indeed any trier-of-fact, all need to be aware of what we term the 'modern view of human memory'.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 502-505 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Psychologist |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- EXPERIENCES
- COURTROOM
- EXPERT
- LAW
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beliefs about autobiographical memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver