Because it's there! Why some children count, rather than infer numerical relationships

Kevin Muldoon, Charlie Lewis, John Towse

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Two experiments are described that investigate the ability to infer the number of items in one-to-one corresponding sets for two age groups. We assess the influence of set size, the visibility of sets, and the way in which set equivalence is derived - pairing versus sharing - using a repeated-measures design. Three-year-olds are largely restricted to inferring number after separating out conceptually paired items. In contrast, four-year-olds are able to make appropriate inferences about shared items, but they typically prefer to count those items if they are visible. Moreover, the size of corresponding sets affects children's propensity to count rather than infer. Children count more often on larger sets. The ability to infer number using cardinal extension is associated most strongly with sharing proficiency, although counting skills also play an important part. We discuss how the data reveal an emerging understanding of the relationship between one-to-one correspondence and cardinality. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)472-491
    Number of pages20
    JournalCognitive Development
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2005

    Fingerprint

    ability
    equivalence
    age group
    experiment

    Keywords

    • Counting
    • Numerical equivalence
    • One-to-one correspondence
    • Sharing

    Cite this

    @article{f8e582de32084bae8fac9c2bd632b09f,
    title = "Because it's there! Why some children count, rather than infer numerical relationships",
    abstract = "Two experiments are described that investigate the ability to infer the number of items in one-to-one corresponding sets for two age groups. We assess the influence of set size, the visibility of sets, and the way in which set equivalence is derived - pairing versus sharing - using a repeated-measures design. Three-year-olds are largely restricted to inferring number after separating out conceptually paired items. In contrast, four-year-olds are able to make appropriate inferences about shared items, but they typically prefer to count those items if they are visible. Moreover, the size of corresponding sets affects children's propensity to count rather than infer. Children count more often on larger sets. The ability to infer number using cardinal extension is associated most strongly with sharing proficiency, although counting skills also play an important part. We discuss how the data reveal an emerging understanding of the relationship between one-to-one correspondence and cardinality. {\circledC} 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
    keywords = "Counting, Numerical equivalence, One-to-one correspondence, Sharing",
    author = "Kevin Muldoon and Charlie Lewis and John Towse",
    year = "2005",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.05.008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "472--491",
    journal = "Cognitive Development",
    issn = "0885-2014",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "3",

    }

    Because it's there! Why some children count, rather than infer numerical relationships. / Muldoon, Kevin; Lewis, Charlie; Towse, John.

    In: Cognitive Development, Vol. 20, No. 3, 07.2005, p. 472-491.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Because it's there! Why some children count, rather than infer numerical relationships

    AU - Muldoon, Kevin

    AU - Lewis, Charlie

    AU - Towse, John

    PY - 2005/7

    Y1 - 2005/7

    N2 - Two experiments are described that investigate the ability to infer the number of items in one-to-one corresponding sets for two age groups. We assess the influence of set size, the visibility of sets, and the way in which set equivalence is derived - pairing versus sharing - using a repeated-measures design. Three-year-olds are largely restricted to inferring number after separating out conceptually paired items. In contrast, four-year-olds are able to make appropriate inferences about shared items, but they typically prefer to count those items if they are visible. Moreover, the size of corresponding sets affects children's propensity to count rather than infer. Children count more often on larger sets. The ability to infer number using cardinal extension is associated most strongly with sharing proficiency, although counting skills also play an important part. We discuss how the data reveal an emerging understanding of the relationship between one-to-one correspondence and cardinality. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    AB - Two experiments are described that investigate the ability to infer the number of items in one-to-one corresponding sets for two age groups. We assess the influence of set size, the visibility of sets, and the way in which set equivalence is derived - pairing versus sharing - using a repeated-measures design. Three-year-olds are largely restricted to inferring number after separating out conceptually paired items. In contrast, four-year-olds are able to make appropriate inferences about shared items, but they typically prefer to count those items if they are visible. Moreover, the size of corresponding sets affects children's propensity to count rather than infer. Children count more often on larger sets. The ability to infer number using cardinal extension is associated most strongly with sharing proficiency, although counting skills also play an important part. We discuss how the data reveal an emerging understanding of the relationship between one-to-one correspondence and cardinality. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    KW - Counting

    KW - Numerical equivalence

    KW - One-to-one correspondence

    KW - Sharing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23744451810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.05.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.05.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 472

    EP - 491

    JO - Cognitive Development

    JF - Cognitive Development

    SN - 0885-2014

    IS - 3

    ER -