Automatic optimization of oilfield-scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments delivered by diving-support vessel

Oscar Vazquez, Gill Ross, Myles Martin Jordan, Dionysius Angga Adhi Baskoro, Eric Mackay, Clare Johnston, Alistair Strachan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Oilfield-scale deposition is one of the important flow-assurance challenges facing the oil industry. There are a number of methods to mitigate oilfield scale, such as reducing sulfates in the injected brine, reducing water flow, removing damage by using dissolvers or physically by milling or reperforating, and inhibition, which is particularly recommended if a severe risk of sulfate-scale deposition is present. Inhibition consists of injecting a chemical that prevents the deposition of scale, either by stopping nucleation or by retarding crystal growth. The inhibiting chemicals are either injected in a dedicated continuous line or bullheaded as a batch treatment into the formation, commonly known as a scale-squeeze treatment. In general, scale-squeeze treatments consist of the following stages: preflush to condition the formation or act as a buffer to displace tubing fluids; the main treatment, where the main pill of chemical is injected; overflush to displace the chemical deep into the reservoir; a shut-in stage to allow further chemical retention; and placing the well back in production. The well will be protected as long as the concentration of the chemical in the produced brine is greater than a certain threshold, commonly known as minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC). This value is usually between 1 and 20 ppm. The most important factor in a squeeze-treatment design is the squeeze lifetime, which is determined by the volume of water or days of production where the chemical-return concentration is greater than the MIC. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the automatic optimization of squeeze-treatment designs using an optimization algorithm, in particular particle-swarm optimization (PSO). The algorithm provides a number of optimal designs, which result in squeeze lifetimes close to the target. To determine the most efficient design of the optimal designs identified by the algorithm, the following objectives were considered: operational-deployment costs, chemical cost, total-injected-water volume, and squeeze-treatment lifetime. Operational-deployment costs include the support vessel, pump, and tank hire. There might not be a single design optimizing all objectives, and thus the problem becomes a multiobjective optimization. Therefore, a number of Pareto optimal solutions exist. These designs are not dominated by any other design and cannot be bettered. Calculating the Pareto is essential to identify the most efficient design (i.e., the most cost-effective design.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-70
Number of pages11
JournalSPE Journal
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

support vessel
diving
inhibitor
Costs
cost
brine
Water
sulfate
Tubing
Multiobjective optimization
Crystal growth
Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
chemical
oil industry
Nucleation
nucleation
Pumps
water flow
pump
Fluids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Vazquez, Oscar ; Ross, Gill ; Jordan, Myles Martin ; Baskoro, Dionysius Angga Adhi ; Mackay, Eric ; Johnston, Clare ; Strachan, Alistair. / Automatic optimization of oilfield-scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments delivered by diving-support vessel. In: SPE Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 60-70.
@article{213161c8ec694f638b1ed4df5c0666c1,
title = "Automatic optimization of oilfield-scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments delivered by diving-support vessel",
abstract = "Oilfield-scale deposition is one of the important flow-assurance challenges facing the oil industry. There are a number of methods to mitigate oilfield scale, such as reducing sulfates in the injected brine, reducing water flow, removing damage by using dissolvers or physically by milling or reperforating, and inhibition, which is particularly recommended if a severe risk of sulfate-scale deposition is present. Inhibition consists of injecting a chemical that prevents the deposition of scale, either by stopping nucleation or by retarding crystal growth. The inhibiting chemicals are either injected in a dedicated continuous line or bullheaded as a batch treatment into the formation, commonly known as a scale-squeeze treatment. In general, scale-squeeze treatments consist of the following stages: preflush to condition the formation or act as a buffer to displace tubing fluids; the main treatment, where the main pill of chemical is injected; overflush to displace the chemical deep into the reservoir; a shut-in stage to allow further chemical retention; and placing the well back in production. The well will be protected as long as the concentration of the chemical in the produced brine is greater than a certain threshold, commonly known as minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC). This value is usually between 1 and 20 ppm. The most important factor in a squeeze-treatment design is the squeeze lifetime, which is determined by the volume of water or days of production where the chemical-return concentration is greater than the MIC. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the automatic optimization of squeeze-treatment designs using an optimization algorithm, in particular particle-swarm optimization (PSO). The algorithm provides a number of optimal designs, which result in squeeze lifetimes close to the target. To determine the most efficient design of the optimal designs identified by the algorithm, the following objectives were considered: operational-deployment costs, chemical cost, total-injected-water volume, and squeeze-treatment lifetime. Operational-deployment costs include the support vessel, pump, and tank hire. There might not be a single design optimizing all objectives, and thus the problem becomes a multiobjective optimization. Therefore, a number of Pareto optimal solutions exist. These designs are not dominated by any other design and cannot be bettered. Calculating the Pareto is essential to identify the most efficient design (i.e., the most cost-effective design.)",
author = "Oscar Vazquez and Gill Ross and Jordan, {Myles Martin} and Baskoro, {Dionysius Angga Adhi} and Eric Mackay and Clare Johnston and Alistair Strachan",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2118/184535-PA",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "60--70",
journal = "SPE Journal",
issn = "1086-055X",
publisher = "Society of Petroleum Engineers",
number = "1",

}

Automatic optimization of oilfield-scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments delivered by diving-support vessel. / Vazquez, Oscar; Ross, Gill; Jordan, Myles Martin; Baskoro, Dionysius Angga Adhi; Mackay, Eric; Johnston, Clare; Strachan, Alistair.

In: SPE Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 60-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automatic optimization of oilfield-scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments delivered by diving-support vessel

AU - Vazquez, Oscar

AU - Ross, Gill

AU - Jordan, Myles Martin

AU - Baskoro, Dionysius Angga Adhi

AU - Mackay, Eric

AU - Johnston, Clare

AU - Strachan, Alistair

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Oilfield-scale deposition is one of the important flow-assurance challenges facing the oil industry. There are a number of methods to mitigate oilfield scale, such as reducing sulfates in the injected brine, reducing water flow, removing damage by using dissolvers or physically by milling or reperforating, and inhibition, which is particularly recommended if a severe risk of sulfate-scale deposition is present. Inhibition consists of injecting a chemical that prevents the deposition of scale, either by stopping nucleation or by retarding crystal growth. The inhibiting chemicals are either injected in a dedicated continuous line or bullheaded as a batch treatment into the formation, commonly known as a scale-squeeze treatment. In general, scale-squeeze treatments consist of the following stages: preflush to condition the formation or act as a buffer to displace tubing fluids; the main treatment, where the main pill of chemical is injected; overflush to displace the chemical deep into the reservoir; a shut-in stage to allow further chemical retention; and placing the well back in production. The well will be protected as long as the concentration of the chemical in the produced brine is greater than a certain threshold, commonly known as minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC). This value is usually between 1 and 20 ppm. The most important factor in a squeeze-treatment design is the squeeze lifetime, which is determined by the volume of water or days of production where the chemical-return concentration is greater than the MIC. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the automatic optimization of squeeze-treatment designs using an optimization algorithm, in particular particle-swarm optimization (PSO). The algorithm provides a number of optimal designs, which result in squeeze lifetimes close to the target. To determine the most efficient design of the optimal designs identified by the algorithm, the following objectives were considered: operational-deployment costs, chemical cost, total-injected-water volume, and squeeze-treatment lifetime. Operational-deployment costs include the support vessel, pump, and tank hire. There might not be a single design optimizing all objectives, and thus the problem becomes a multiobjective optimization. Therefore, a number of Pareto optimal solutions exist. These designs are not dominated by any other design and cannot be bettered. Calculating the Pareto is essential to identify the most efficient design (i.e., the most cost-effective design.)

AB - Oilfield-scale deposition is one of the important flow-assurance challenges facing the oil industry. There are a number of methods to mitigate oilfield scale, such as reducing sulfates in the injected brine, reducing water flow, removing damage by using dissolvers or physically by milling or reperforating, and inhibition, which is particularly recommended if a severe risk of sulfate-scale deposition is present. Inhibition consists of injecting a chemical that prevents the deposition of scale, either by stopping nucleation or by retarding crystal growth. The inhibiting chemicals are either injected in a dedicated continuous line or bullheaded as a batch treatment into the formation, commonly known as a scale-squeeze treatment. In general, scale-squeeze treatments consist of the following stages: preflush to condition the formation or act as a buffer to displace tubing fluids; the main treatment, where the main pill of chemical is injected; overflush to displace the chemical deep into the reservoir; a shut-in stage to allow further chemical retention; and placing the well back in production. The well will be protected as long as the concentration of the chemical in the produced brine is greater than a certain threshold, commonly known as minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC). This value is usually between 1 and 20 ppm. The most important factor in a squeeze-treatment design is the squeeze lifetime, which is determined by the volume of water or days of production where the chemical-return concentration is greater than the MIC. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the automatic optimization of squeeze-treatment designs using an optimization algorithm, in particular particle-swarm optimization (PSO). The algorithm provides a number of optimal designs, which result in squeeze lifetimes close to the target. To determine the most efficient design of the optimal designs identified by the algorithm, the following objectives were considered: operational-deployment costs, chemical cost, total-injected-water volume, and squeeze-treatment lifetime. Operational-deployment costs include the support vessel, pump, and tank hire. There might not be a single design optimizing all objectives, and thus the problem becomes a multiobjective optimization. Therefore, a number of Pareto optimal solutions exist. These designs are not dominated by any other design and cannot be bettered. Calculating the Pareto is essential to identify the most efficient design (i.e., the most cost-effective design.)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064917931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2118/184535-PA

DO - 10.2118/184535-PA

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 60

EP - 70

JO - SPE Journal

JF - SPE Journal

SN - 1086-055X

IS - 1

ER -