TY - JOUR
T1 - Automatic balancing mechanisms for mixed pension systems under different investment strategies
AU - Boado-Penas, María del Carmen
AU - Godínez-Olivares, Humberto
AU - Haberman, Steven
AU - Serrano, Pedro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/2/11
Y1 - 2020/2/11
N2 - State pension systems are usually pay-as-you-go financed, i.e. current contributions cover pension expenditure. However, some countries combine funding and pay-as-you-go (PAYG) elements within the first pillar. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, using nonlinear optimisation based on [Godínez-Olivares, H., M. C. Boado-Penas, and S. Haberman. 2016. “Optimal strategies for pay-as-you-go pension finance: A sustainability framework.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 69: 117–126], it seeks to assess the impact of a compulsory funded defined contribution (DC) pension scheme that complements the traditional defined benefit (DB) PAYG on the level of pension benefits. Future expected returns for both the funded part and the buffer fund of the PAYG are simulated through the non-overlapping block bootstrap technique. Second, in the case of partial financial sustainability, we design different optimal strategies, that involve variables such as the contribution rate, age of retirement and indexation of pensions, to restore the long-term financial equilibrium of the system. We show that the adjustments needed to ensure sustainability for the mixed pension systems are less severe than the pure DB PAYG but the total replacement rate for the former is lower in most of the cases studied. When calculating the return that the individuals would receive, we prove that some cohorts are better off under a mixed pension system.
AB - State pension systems are usually pay-as-you-go financed, i.e. current contributions cover pension expenditure. However, some countries combine funding and pay-as-you-go (PAYG) elements within the first pillar. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, using nonlinear optimisation based on [Godínez-Olivares, H., M. C. Boado-Penas, and S. Haberman. 2016. “Optimal strategies for pay-as-you-go pension finance: A sustainability framework.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 69: 117–126], it seeks to assess the impact of a compulsory funded defined contribution (DC) pension scheme that complements the traditional defined benefit (DB) PAYG on the level of pension benefits. Future expected returns for both the funded part and the buffer fund of the PAYG are simulated through the non-overlapping block bootstrap technique. Second, in the case of partial financial sustainability, we design different optimal strategies, that involve variables such as the contribution rate, age of retirement and indexation of pensions, to restore the long-term financial equilibrium of the system. We show that the adjustments needed to ensure sustainability for the mixed pension systems are less severe than the pure DB PAYG but the total replacement rate for the former is lower in most of the cases studied. When calculating the return that the individuals would receive, we prove that some cohorts are better off under a mixed pension system.
KW - Investment allocation
KW - optimisation
KW - pay-as-you-go
KW - public pensions
KW - risk
KW - simulation
KW - sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077676837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1351847X.2019.1647260
DO - 10.1080/1351847X.2019.1647260
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077676837
SN - 1351-847X
VL - 26
SP - 277
EP - 294
JO - European Journal of Finance
JF - European Journal of Finance
IS - 2-3
ER -