This paper examines the use of water features for masking irrelevant speech and improving the soundscape of open-plan offices. Two laboratory experiments were carried out, as well as acoustic simulations and field tests. Experiment 1 aimed to identify the preferred sound level of water sounds against irrelevant speech. Experiment 2 examined the audio-only and audio-visual preferences and perception of waterscapes. Acoustic simulations and field tests examined the impact of design factors. The results showed that, when played against a constant level of irrelevant speech of 48 dBA, people prefer to listen to water sounds of 42-48 dBA (45 dBA being best). These results and results from previous research suggest that water sounds work mainly as informational maskers rather than energetic maskers. Furthermore, the introduction of a water feature improved the perception of the sound environment, and adding visual stimuli improved perception by up to 2.5 times. Acoustic simulations indicated that features at each corner and one at the center (or a single feature with an array of speakers) can provide appropriate masking for a large open-plan office, whilst field tests showed that water sounds decrease the distraction and privacy distances significantly (clusters of workstations benefitting more than rows of workstations).
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics
- School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Institute for Sustainable Building Design - Assistant Professor
- School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society - Assistant Professor
Person: Academic (Research & Teaching)