At the limits of Cultural Heritage Rights? The Glasgow Bajuni Campaign and the UK Immigration System

A Case Study

Emma Hill, Máiréad Nic Craith, Cristina Clopot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Contemporary policy and scholarship recognises an important and enduring relationship between cultural heritage and human rights. However, despite this broad recognition, the mobilisation of cultural heritage as a right has been lacking application, structure or sustained interrogation, particularly in contexts where peoples and their heritages are vulnerable. Based on participatory ethnographic work on the asylum applications of the Somali Bajuni campaigners in Glasgow, UK, this paper explores the extent to which the rights-based discourses involved in cultural heritage and in seeking asylum can(not) speak to each other. In a detailed consideration of the Bajuni campaigners' cases, the paper traces how top-down definitions of the campaigners' intangible cultural heritages are used to persistently deny them asylum in the UK. Taking its cue from the campaigners' own arguments, and drawing on decolonising scholarship, the paper argues that an emphasis on grounded, minority-group led definitions of heritage is a vital part of the process that sees cultural heritage fundamentally embedded in discourses about human rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-58
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Cultural Property
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

cultural heritage
immigration
campaign
human rights
discourse
mobilization
minority
Group

Cite this

@article{aeba11de7f2f4d86bcc29d69fcf2e5ff,
title = "At the limits of Cultural Heritage Rights? The Glasgow Bajuni Campaign and the UK Immigration System: A Case Study",
abstract = "Contemporary policy and scholarship recognises an important and enduring relationship between cultural heritage and human rights. However, despite this broad recognition, the mobilisation of cultural heritage as a right has been lacking application, structure or sustained interrogation, particularly in contexts where peoples and their heritages are vulnerable. Based on participatory ethnographic work on the asylum applications of the Somali Bajuni campaigners in Glasgow, UK, this paper explores the extent to which the rights-based discourses involved in cultural heritage and in seeking asylum can(not) speak to each other. In a detailed consideration of the Bajuni campaigners' cases, the paper traces how top-down definitions of the campaigners' intangible cultural heritages are used to persistently deny them asylum in the UK. Taking its cue from the campaigners' own arguments, and drawing on decolonising scholarship, the paper argues that an emphasis on grounded, minority-group led definitions of heritage is a vital part of the process that sees cultural heritage fundamentally embedded in discourses about human rights.",
author = "Emma Hill and {Nic Craith}, M{\'a}ir{\'e}ad and Cristina Clopot",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/S0940739118000024",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "35--58",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Property",
issn = "0940-7391",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

At the limits of Cultural Heritage Rights? The Glasgow Bajuni Campaign and the UK Immigration System : A Case Study. / Hill, Emma; Nic Craith, Máiréad; Clopot, Cristina.

In: International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 25, No. 1, 14.02.2018, p. 35-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - At the limits of Cultural Heritage Rights? The Glasgow Bajuni Campaign and the UK Immigration System

T2 - A Case Study

AU - Hill, Emma

AU - Nic Craith, Máiréad

AU - Clopot, Cristina

PY - 2018/2/14

Y1 - 2018/2/14

N2 - Contemporary policy and scholarship recognises an important and enduring relationship between cultural heritage and human rights. However, despite this broad recognition, the mobilisation of cultural heritage as a right has been lacking application, structure or sustained interrogation, particularly in contexts where peoples and their heritages are vulnerable. Based on participatory ethnographic work on the asylum applications of the Somali Bajuni campaigners in Glasgow, UK, this paper explores the extent to which the rights-based discourses involved in cultural heritage and in seeking asylum can(not) speak to each other. In a detailed consideration of the Bajuni campaigners' cases, the paper traces how top-down definitions of the campaigners' intangible cultural heritages are used to persistently deny them asylum in the UK. Taking its cue from the campaigners' own arguments, and drawing on decolonising scholarship, the paper argues that an emphasis on grounded, minority-group led definitions of heritage is a vital part of the process that sees cultural heritage fundamentally embedded in discourses about human rights.

AB - Contemporary policy and scholarship recognises an important and enduring relationship between cultural heritage and human rights. However, despite this broad recognition, the mobilisation of cultural heritage as a right has been lacking application, structure or sustained interrogation, particularly in contexts where peoples and their heritages are vulnerable. Based on participatory ethnographic work on the asylum applications of the Somali Bajuni campaigners in Glasgow, UK, this paper explores the extent to which the rights-based discourses involved in cultural heritage and in seeking asylum can(not) speak to each other. In a detailed consideration of the Bajuni campaigners' cases, the paper traces how top-down definitions of the campaigners' intangible cultural heritages are used to persistently deny them asylum in the UK. Taking its cue from the campaigners' own arguments, and drawing on decolonising scholarship, the paper argues that an emphasis on grounded, minority-group led definitions of heritage is a vital part of the process that sees cultural heritage fundamentally embedded in discourses about human rights.

U2 - 10.1017/S0940739118000024

DO - 10.1017/S0940739118000024

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 35

EP - 58

JO - International Journal of Cultural Property

JF - International Journal of Cultural Property

SN - 0940-7391

IS - 1

ER -