Assessment of three phase relative permeability and hysteresis models for simulation of water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection in water-wet and mixed-wet systems

Omid Shahrokhi, Seyyed Mobeen Fatemi, Mehran Sohrabi, Shaun Ireland, Kamran Ahmed

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

17 Citations (Scopus)


Obtaining reliable relative permeability (kr) values and their variations is difficult particularly in processes involving three-phase flow and flow reversal (e.g. WAG injection) which results in kr hysteresis. The current approach in the industry is to use a three-phase kr correlation (e.g., Stone I, Stone II, Baker) in conjunction with a kr hysteresis model (e.g., Killough, WAG- Hysteresis). However, these models have been mostly developed based on water-wet systems and have rarely been benchmarked against experimental measurements. In this paper, we present the results of an extensive assessment of different three-phase relative permeability models available in the most widely used reservoir simulators. The input two-phase data needed for using three-phase kr correlations were obtained from core flood experiments. The simulation results were directly compared with WAG injection experiments performed under both water-wet and mixed-wet conditions. The results show significant differences between the simulation and experimental results of WAG injection. In water-wet rocks, the results show that without considering kr hysteresis, Stone-I model underestimates WAG performance, but it overestimates oil recovery in mixed-wet rocks. SWI and Baker correlations overestimate WAG performance in water-wet rocks while for mixed-wet rocks they significantly underestimate production data. For both wettabilities, Stone-II significantly underestimates oil production. The generated recovery trends by IKU model show a relative advantage over other models but still underestimates the performance of WAG injection especially for later cycles. Coupling of three-phase kr correlations with hysteresis models (Carlson, Killough and Jargon) generally results in highly overestimated oil recovery predictions especially for mixed-wet conditions. For water-wet systems, coupling Stone-I with WAG-hysteresis model improves the predictions up to the second gas injection period. Nevertheless, serious underestimation is observed for further cycles. The WAG-hysteresis model overestimated WAG performance in mixed-wet systems. To improve its prediction, based on our experimental results, WAG-hysteresis model parameters were adjusted after each cycle. This modified approach improved simulation results in water-wet systems. However, none of the available approaches could adequately reproduce experimental results obtained for mixed-wet conditions. This is a major concern for predication of WAG performance in real reservoirs which are believed to be mixed-wet.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery
Place of PublicationRichardson, Texas
PublisherSociety of Petroleum Engineers
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781613993095
ISBN (Print)9781632663863
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Event19th SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium 2014 - Tulsa, OK, United Kingdom
Duration: 12 Apr 201416 Apr 2014


Conference19th SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium 2014
Abbreviated titleIOR 2014
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityTulsa, OK


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of three phase relative permeability and hysteresis models for simulation of water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection in water-wet and mixed-wet systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this