Assessment of data error for 4D quantitative interpretation

Mohamed Hatab*, Colin MacBeth

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


Most descriptions of 4D seismic error do not capture the full uncertainties in the seismic data or do not make the correct assumptions when looking at this error. Furthermore we should also recognise that the error may not only be in 4D seismic but can also be in the simulation model. Thus, to match the 4D seismic (observed) to simulation model (predicted), assessment of both error sources is required. Here, we specifically address the data error components for the 4D seismic interpretation and 4D Seismic History Matching (SHM).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3439-3443
Number of pages5
JournalSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021
Event1st International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy 2021 - Denver, United States
Duration: 26 Sept 20211 Oct 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Geophysics


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of data error for 4D quantitative interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this