Appealing to economic (vs. health) risk may be more effective to fight COVID-19: A multilevel analysis in 24 countries

PsyCorona Team

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

This paper examines whether compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures is motivated by wanting to save lives or save the economy (or both), and which implications this carries to fight the pandemic. National representative samples were collected from 24 countries (N=25,435). The main predictors were (i) perceived risk to contract coronavirus, (ii) perceived risk to suffer economic losses due to coronavirus, and (iii) their interaction effect. Individual and country-level variables were added as covariates in multilevel regression models. We examined compliance with various preventive health behaviors and support for strict containment policies. Results show that perceived economic risk consistently predicted mitigation behavior and policy support - and its effects were positive. Perceived health risk had mixed effects. Only two significant interactions between health and economic risk were identified – both positive. These results do not corroborate the view that people engage in health versus economy zero-sum thinking in the fight against COVID-19.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPsyArXiv
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Covid-19
  • Perceived economic risks
  • Health behaviours
  • Prosocial behaviour

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Appealing to economic (vs. health) risk may be more effective to fight COVID-19: A multilevel analysis in 24 countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this