An Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment to Support Grouping and Read-Across of Nanomaterials after Inhalation Exposure

Hedwig M. Braakhuis*, Fiona Murphy, Lan Ma-Hock, Susan Dekkers, Johannes Keller, Agnes G. Oomen, Vicki Stone

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Here, we describe the generation of hypotheses for grouping nanoforms (NFs) after inhalation exposure and the tailored Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) with which each specific hypothesis can be tested. This is part of a state-of-the-art framework to support the hypothesis-driven grouping and read-across of NFs, as developed by the EU-funded Horizon 2020 project GRACIOUS.

Development of Grouping Hypotheses and IATA: Respirable NFs, depending on their physicochemical properties, may dissolve either in lung lining fluid or in acidic lysosomal fluid after uptake by cells. Alternatively, NFs may also persist in particulate form. Dissolution in the lung is, therefore, a decisive factor for the toxicokinetics of NFs. This has led to the development of four hypotheses, broadly grouping NFs as instantaneous, quickly, gradually, and very slowly dissolving NFs. For instantaneously dissolving NFs, hazard information can be derived by read-across from the ions. For quickly dissolving particles, as accumulation of particles is not expected, ion toxicity will drive the toxic profile. However, the particle aspect influences the location of the ion release. For gradually dissolving and very slowly dissolving NFs, particle-driven toxicity is of concern. These NFs may be grouped by their reactivity and inflammation potency. The hypotheses are substantiated by a tailored IATA, which describes the minimum information and laboratory assessments of NFs under investigation required to justify grouping.

Conclusion: The GRACIOUS hypotheses and tailored IATA for respiratory toxicity of inhaled NFs can be used to support decision making regarding Safe(r)-by-Design product development or adoption of precautionary measures to mitigate potential risks. It can also be used to support read-across of adverse effects such as pulmonary inflammation and subsequent downstream effects such as lung fibrosis and lung tumor formation after long-term exposure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-128
Number of pages17
JournalApplied In Vitro Toxicology
Volume7
Issue number3
Early online date9 Sept 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sept 2021

Keywords

  • case study
  • grouping
  • IATA
  • inhalation exposure
  • nanomaterials
  • read-across
  • testing strategy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Medical Laboratory Technology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment to Support Grouping and Read-Across of Nanomaterials after Inhalation Exposure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this