Abstract
Continental pawnbroking institutions, Monts-de-Piété, were introduced in Ireland in the 1830s and 1840s but did not establish a permanent status. Irish social reformers believed that a Mont-de-Piété system would reduce the cost of borrowing for the poor and also fund a social welfare network, thus negating the need for an Irish Poor Law. This article explores the introduction of the Mont-de-Piété charitable pawnbroker in Ireland and outlines some reasons for its failure. It uses the market incumbents, private pawnbrokers, as a base group in a comparative study and asks why the Monts-de-Piété were the unsuccessful ones of the two. The article finds that the public nature and monopoly status of Monts-de-Piété on the Continent realised economies of scale and gave preferential interest rates on capital, as well as enabling the Mont-de-Piété loan book to be cross-subsidised. These conditions were not replicated in Ireland, hence the failure of the Monts-de- Piété there.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 49-72 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Financial History Review |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2013 |
Keywords
- I38
- JEL classification L33
- N14
- N24
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Finance