Abstract
Value-based decision is very complicated since many parties involved. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a negotiation is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Decision techniques applied to determine the relative value of the alternative solutions for performing the function. The results demonstrate a comparison of aggregation and coalition formation in a multi criteria group decision and negotiation. It further emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in the design process and value-based decision.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making |
Publisher | IEEE |
Pages | 118-125 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4244-2764-2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Event | 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making - Nashville, United States Duration: 30 Mar 2009 → 2 Apr 2009 |
Conference
Conference | 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | MCDM 2009 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Nashville |
Period | 30/03/09 → 2/04/09 |
Keywords
- VALUE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS
- SUPPORT-SYSTEM
- SELECTION