Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision

Christiono Utomo, Arazi Idrus, Madzlan Napiah, Mohd Faris Khamidi

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Value-based decision is very complicated since many parties involved. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a negotiation is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Decision techniques applied to determine the relative value of the alternative solutions for performing the function. The results demonstrate a comparison of aggregation and coalition formation in a multi criteria group decision and negotiation. It further emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in the design process and value-based decision.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    PublisherIEEE
    Pages118-125
    Number of pages8
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4244-2764-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009
    Event2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making - Nashville, United States
    Duration: 30 Mar 20092 Apr 2009

    Conference

    Conference2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Abbreviated titleMCDM 2009
    CountryUnited States
    CityNashville
    Period30/03/092/04/09

    Keywords

    • VALUE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS
    • SUPPORT-SYSTEM
    • SELECTION

    Cite this