Ageing, skills and participation in work-related training in Britain: assessing the position of older workers

Jesus Canduela, Matthew Dutton, Steve Johnson, Colin Lindsay*, Ronald W. McQuaid, Robert Raeside

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    45 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Policy makers have introduced a number of measures to encourage older workers to stay in the labour market, with improving access to training a particular priority. Policy action appeared justified by evidence that older workers are less likely to participate in training, and more likely to have never been offered training by employers - a key finding of Taylor and Urwin's (2001) review of Labour Force Survey (LFS) data from 1997. This article models LFS data from 2007 to assess whether age remained a predictor of inequalities in training. It finds that men over 50 remained among those least likely to have been offered training by employers. There were other significant inequalities in participation, suggesting a polarization in access to jobs that offer opportunities for training and progression. The article concludes that policies promoting 'active ageing' need to challenge negative employer attitudes and acknowledge fundamental inequalities in access to skills.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)42-60
    Number of pages19
    JournalWork, Employment and Society
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

    Keywords

    • ageing
    • equalities
    • Labour Force Survey
    • learning
    • ordered-probit modelling
    • training

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Accounting
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ageing, skills and participation in work-related training in Britain: assessing the position of older workers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this