Affordability, poverty and housing need: triangulating measures and standards

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Over the last 25 years, ‘affordability’ has become a more important issue in housing policy, although it is still not fully enshrined in agreed standards, partly due to different views about how it should be measured and at what thresholds. This paper argues that subjective evidence of payment problems and material hardship can be used to validate ratio measures and points to the best thresholds to use. Using household panel survey evidence it is shown that traditional affordability ratios are still probably the best objective measure, with residual income ratios in a supporting role; and that relatively generous thresholds are better. Composites with subjective payment problems are well validated by independent evidence on material hardship, and are associated with higher incidence of moves and other housing needs. These problems are much more prevalent in private renting, with less variation between regions than household types. Multivariate models shows strong effects from income and prices interacted with interest rates, especially for owners, with significant labour market and demographic effects, and substantial effects for renters from the supply of social lettings.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)133-151
    JournalJournal of Housing and the Built Environment
    Volume27
    Issue number2
    Early online date27 Dec 2011
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Affordability
    Poverty
    Household
    Payment
    Owners
    Multivariate models
    Interest rates
    Demographic effects
    Income
    Housing policy
    Labour market
    Residual income

    Keywords

    • Housing affordability
    • Poverty
    • Housing need
    • Affordability standards

    Cite this

    @article{0b5c5c40535447ef93a7471162bca676,
    title = "Affordability, poverty and housing need: triangulating measures and standards",
    abstract = "Over the last 25 years, ‘affordability’ has become a more important issue in housing policy, although it is still not fully enshrined in agreed standards, partly due to different views about how it should be measured and at what thresholds. This paper argues that subjective evidence of payment problems and material hardship can be used to validate ratio measures and points to the best thresholds to use. Using household panel survey evidence it is shown that traditional affordability ratios are still probably the best objective measure, with residual income ratios in a supporting role; and that relatively generous thresholds are better. Composites with subjective payment problems are well validated by independent evidence on material hardship, and are associated with higher incidence of moves and other housing needs. These problems are much more prevalent in private renting, with less variation between regions than household types. Multivariate models shows strong effects from income and prices interacted with interest rates, especially for owners, with significant labour market and demographic effects, and substantial effects for renters from the supply of social lettings.",
    keywords = "Housing affordability, Poverty, Housing need, Affordability standards",
    author = "Glen Bramley",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1007/s10901-011-9255-4",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "133--151",
    journal = "Journal of Housing and the Built Environment",
    issn = "1566-4910",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    Affordability, poverty and housing need: triangulating measures and standards. / Bramley, Glen.

    In: Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2012, p. 133-151.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Affordability, poverty and housing need: triangulating measures and standards

    AU - Bramley, Glen

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Over the last 25 years, ‘affordability’ has become a more important issue in housing policy, although it is still not fully enshrined in agreed standards, partly due to different views about how it should be measured and at what thresholds. This paper argues that subjective evidence of payment problems and material hardship can be used to validate ratio measures and points to the best thresholds to use. Using household panel survey evidence it is shown that traditional affordability ratios are still probably the best objective measure, with residual income ratios in a supporting role; and that relatively generous thresholds are better. Composites with subjective payment problems are well validated by independent evidence on material hardship, and are associated with higher incidence of moves and other housing needs. These problems are much more prevalent in private renting, with less variation between regions than household types. Multivariate models shows strong effects from income and prices interacted with interest rates, especially for owners, with significant labour market and demographic effects, and substantial effects for renters from the supply of social lettings.

    AB - Over the last 25 years, ‘affordability’ has become a more important issue in housing policy, although it is still not fully enshrined in agreed standards, partly due to different views about how it should be measured and at what thresholds. This paper argues that subjective evidence of payment problems and material hardship can be used to validate ratio measures and points to the best thresholds to use. Using household panel survey evidence it is shown that traditional affordability ratios are still probably the best objective measure, with residual income ratios in a supporting role; and that relatively generous thresholds are better. Composites with subjective payment problems are well validated by independent evidence on material hardship, and are associated with higher incidence of moves and other housing needs. These problems are much more prevalent in private renting, with less variation between regions than household types. Multivariate models shows strong effects from income and prices interacted with interest rates, especially for owners, with significant labour market and demographic effects, and substantial effects for renters from the supply of social lettings.

    KW - Housing affordability

    KW - Poverty

    KW - Housing need

    KW - Affordability standards

    U2 - 10.1007/s10901-011-9255-4

    DO - 10.1007/s10901-011-9255-4

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 133

    EP - 151

    JO - Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

    JF - Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

    SN - 1566-4910

    IS - 2

    ER -