TY - JOUR
T1 - Adapting optimal velocity tracking control to account for WEC constraints and power-take-off efficiencies
AU - Stock, Adam
AU - Tom, Nathan
AU - Gonzalez, Carlos
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions from the International Network of Offshore Renewable Engineers Ocean Energy Systems Blue Energy Collaborative Scholarship and the University of Strathclyde Global Engagements Fund. The authors would also like to thank Wave Energy Scotland, who funded the development of the IMPACT control toolbox through their Control Systems funding call whilst two of the authors were working for Wood (see https://library.waveenergyscotland.co.uk). The assistance from other staff members at Wood, from the project partners Cruz-Atcheson, and from Trident Energy, who supplied PTO information, are gratefully noted. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Water Power Technologies Office. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Wave energy converters (WECs) come in many different forms, from point absorbers and oscillating water columns to bulge wave devices. This paper focuses on the control of point absorber WECs, which typically have a narrow-banded frequency response and, therefore, control is well placed to improve the energy capture of such WECs. The acausal nature of the control problem means that, theoretically optimal control is almost impossible to achieve in practice; however, optimal velocity tracking (OVT) offers a simple and robust approximation to optimal control that can achieve better power capture than passive linear damping methods, albeit with necessarily higher force demands. OVT is a form of impedance matching and the magnitude of the power-take-off (PTO) force demand is often not linearly proportional to the WEC velocity, which can lead to PTO force and speed combinations far from the optimal PTO efficiency. The highly nonlinear PTO force and speed to efficiency mapping can, without remedial measures, severely diminish the effectiveness of OVT techniques. In this paper, improvements to OVT are made, particularly regarding the limits on motion. In particular, a limit on acceleration is added and drift of the position when the acceleration and/or velocity are limited is prevented through the addition of a new integral term. An anti-wind up methodology to prevent controller integral wind up is also included. These additions allow OVT to be more easily applied in practice. The effect of PTO efficiency is explored, and a novel potential solution to the problem of adapting control to account for efficiency is presented. Both aspects of the work presented highlight the requirement for co-design of the WEC, PTO, and controller.
AB - Wave energy converters (WECs) come in many different forms, from point absorbers and oscillating water columns to bulge wave devices. This paper focuses on the control of point absorber WECs, which typically have a narrow-banded frequency response and, therefore, control is well placed to improve the energy capture of such WECs. The acausal nature of the control problem means that, theoretically optimal control is almost impossible to achieve in practice; however, optimal velocity tracking (OVT) offers a simple and robust approximation to optimal control that can achieve better power capture than passive linear damping methods, albeit with necessarily higher force demands. OVT is a form of impedance matching and the magnitude of the power-take-off (PTO) force demand is often not linearly proportional to the WEC velocity, which can lead to PTO force and speed combinations far from the optimal PTO efficiency. The highly nonlinear PTO force and speed to efficiency mapping can, without remedial measures, severely diminish the effectiveness of OVT techniques. In this paper, improvements to OVT are made, particularly regarding the limits on motion. In particular, a limit on acceleration is added and drift of the position when the acceleration and/or velocity are limited is prevented through the addition of a new integral term. An anti-wind up methodology to prevent controller integral wind up is also included. These additions allow OVT to be more easily applied in practice. The effect of PTO efficiency is explored, and a novel potential solution to the problem of adapting control to account for efficiency is presented. Both aspects of the work presented highlight the requirement for co-design of the WEC, PTO, and controller.
KW - Conversion efficiency
KW - Optimal control
KW - Sensitivity
KW - System constraints
KW - Wave energy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092030705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1224
DO - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1224
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85092030705
SN - 2405-8963
VL - 53
SP - 12340
EP - 12345
JO - IFAC-PapersOnLine
JF - IFAC-PapersOnLine
IS - 2
T2 - 21st IFAC World Congress 2020
Y2 - 12 July 2020 through 17 July 2020
ER -