Actuarial fairness and solidarity in pooled annuity funds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)


Various types of structures that enable a group of individuals to pool their mortality risk have been proposed in the literature. Collectively, the structures are called pooled annuity funds. Since the pooled annuity funds propose different methods of pooling mortality risk, we investigate the connections between them and find that they are genuinely different for a finite heterogeneous membership profile. We discuss the importance of actuarial fairness, defined as the expected benefits equalling the contributions for each member, in the context of pooling mortality risk and comment on whether actuarial unfairness can be seen as solidarity between members. We show that, with a finite number of members in the fund, the group self-annuitization scheme is not actuarially fair: some members subsidize the other members. The implication is that the members who are subsidizing the others may obtain a higher expected benefit by joining a fund with a more favorable membership profile. However, we find that the subsidies are financially significant only for very small or highly heterogeneous membership profiles.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-74
Number of pages26
JournalASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jul 2014
Publication statusPublished - 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Actuarial fairness and solidarity in pooled annuity funds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this