This paper examines the accuracy of the speech transmission index (STI) calculated from the reverberation time (T) and signal-to-noise ratio (LSN) of enclosed spaces. Differences between measured and predicted STIs have been analysed in two rooms (reverberant vs. absorbent), for a wide range of absorption conditions and signal-to-noise ratios (sixteen tests). The STI was measured using maximum length sequence analysis and predictions were calculated using either measured or predicted values of T and LSN, the latter assuming diffuse sound field conditions. The results obtained for all the conditions tested showed that STI predictions based on T and LSN tend to underestimate the STI, with differences between measured and predicted STIs always lower than 0.1 (on a 0.0 - 1.0 scale), and on average lower than 0.06. According to previous research, these differences are noticeable and therefore non-negligible, as 0.03 is the just noticeable difference in STI. The use of either measured or predicted values of T and LSN provided similar STI predictions (i.e. non-noticeable changes), with differences between predictions that are on average lower than 0.03 for the absorbent room, and lower than 0.01 for the reverberant room.
|Number of pages||14|
|Publication status||Published - Jul 2014|
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of speech transmission index predictions based on the reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Institute for Sustainable Building Design - Assistant Professor
- School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society - Assistant Professor
Person: Academic (Research & Teaching)