Accounting for Beneficial Effects of Worked Examples in Tutored Problem Solving

Ron J. C. M. Salden, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Alexander Renkl, Vincent Aleven, Bruce M. McLaren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have tested the addition of worked examples to tutored problem solving, a more effective instructional approach than the untutored problem solving used in prior worked example research. These studies involved Cognitive Tutors, software designed to support problem solving while minimizing extraneous cognitive load by providing prompts for problem sub-goals, step-based immediate feedback, and context-sensitive hints. Results across eight studies in three different domains indicate that adding examples to Cognitive Tutors is beneficial, particularly for decreasing the instructional time needed and perhaps also for achieving more robust learning outcomes. These studies bolster the practical importance of examples in learning, but are also of theoretical interest. By using a stronger control condition than previous studies, these studies provide a basis for refining Cognitive Load Theory explanations of the benefits of examples. Perhaps, in addition to other reasons, examples may help simply because they more quickly provide novices with information needed to induce generalized knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379–392
Number of pages14
JournalEducational Psychology Review
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for Beneficial Effects of Worked Examples in Tutored Problem Solving'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this