A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world interventions for cognitive ageing in healthy older adults

Eleftheria Vaportzis, Malwina A. Niechcial, Alan J. Gow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Activities running in community-based-settings offer a method of delivering multimodal interventions to older adults beyond cognitive training programmes. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ‘real-world’ interventions on the cognitive abilities of healthy older adults. Database searches were performed between October 2016 and September 2018. Forty-three RCTs were eligible for inclusion with 2826 intervention participants and 2234 controls. Interventions to enhance cognitive ability consisted of participation in activities that were physical (25 studies), cognitive (9 studies), or mixed (i.e., physical and cognitive; 7 studies), and two studies used other interventions that included older adults assisting schoolchildren and engagement via social network sites. Meta-analysis revealed that Trail Making Test (TMT) A, p =  0.05, M = 0.43, 95% CI [-0.00, 0.86], digit symbol substitution, p =  0.05, M = 0.30, 95% CI [0.00, 0.59], and verbal fluency, p =  0.04, M = 0.31, 95% CI [0.02, 0.61], improved after specific types of interventions versus the control groups (which were either active, wait-list or passive controls). When comparing physical activity interventions against all control groups, TMT A, p =  0.04, M = 0.25, 95% CI [0.01, 0.48], and digit span forward, p =  0.05, M = 0.91, 95% CI [-0.00, 1.82], significantly improved. Results remained non-significant for all outcomes when comparing cognitive activity interventions against all control groups. Results therefore suggest that healthy older adults are more likely to see cognitive improvements when involved in physical activity interventions. In addition, TMT A was the only measure that consistently showed significant improvements following physical activity interventions. Visuospatial abilities (as measured by TMT A) may be more susceptible to improvement following physical activity-based interventions, and TMT A may be a useful tool for detecting differences in that domain.
LanguageEnglish
Pages110-130
Number of pages21
JournalAgeing Research Reviews
Volume50
Early online date29 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Trail Making Test
Meta-Analysis
Aptitude
Control Groups
Randomized Controlled Trials
Social Support
Cognitive Aging
Databases
Education

Keywords

  • Cognitive ageing
  • Community-based interventions
  • Healthy older adults
  • Meta-analysis
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Biochemistry
  • Ageing
  • Molecular Biology
  • Neurology

Cite this

@article{638d975bbd314619886eafe78c6f6626,
title = "A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world interventions for cognitive ageing in healthy older adults",
abstract = "Activities running in community-based-settings offer a method of delivering multimodal interventions to older adults beyond cognitive training programmes. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ‘real-world’ interventions on the cognitive abilities of healthy older adults. Database searches were performed between October 2016 and September 2018. Forty-three RCTs were eligible for inclusion with 2826 intervention participants and 2234 controls. Interventions to enhance cognitive ability consisted of participation in activities that were physical (25 studies), cognitive (9 studies), or mixed (i.e., physical and cognitive; 7 studies), and two studies used other interventions that included older adults assisting schoolchildren and engagement via social network sites. Meta-analysis revealed that Trail Making Test (TMT) A, p =  0.05, M = 0.43, 95{\%} CI [-0.00, 0.86], digit symbol substitution, p =  0.05, M = 0.30, 95{\%} CI [0.00, 0.59], and verbal fluency, p =  0.04, M = 0.31, 95{\%} CI [0.02, 0.61], improved after specific types of interventions versus the control groups (which were either active, wait-list or passive controls). When comparing physical activity interventions against all control groups, TMT A, p =  0.04, M = 0.25, 95{\%} CI [0.01, 0.48], and digit span forward, p =  0.05, M = 0.91, 95{\%} CI [-0.00, 1.82], significantly improved. Results remained non-significant for all outcomes when comparing cognitive activity interventions against all control groups. Results therefore suggest that healthy older adults are more likely to see cognitive improvements when involved in physical activity interventions. In addition, TMT A was the only measure that consistently showed significant improvements following physical activity interventions. Visuospatial abilities (as measured by TMT A) may be more susceptible to improvement following physical activity-based interventions, and TMT A may be a useful tool for detecting differences in that domain.",
keywords = "Cognitive ageing, Community-based interventions, Healthy older adults, Meta-analysis, Systematic review",
author = "Eleftheria Vaportzis and Niechcial, {Malwina A.} and Gow, {Alan J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "110--130",
journal = "Ageing Research Reviews",
issn = "1568-1637",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world interventions for cognitive ageing in healthy older adults. / Vaportzis, Eleftheria; Niechcial, Malwina A.; Gow, Alan J.

In: Ageing Research Reviews, Vol. 50, 03.2019, p. 110-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world interventions for cognitive ageing in healthy older adults

AU - Vaportzis, Eleftheria

AU - Niechcial, Malwina A.

AU - Gow, Alan J.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Activities running in community-based-settings offer a method of delivering multimodal interventions to older adults beyond cognitive training programmes. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ‘real-world’ interventions on the cognitive abilities of healthy older adults. Database searches were performed between October 2016 and September 2018. Forty-three RCTs were eligible for inclusion with 2826 intervention participants and 2234 controls. Interventions to enhance cognitive ability consisted of participation in activities that were physical (25 studies), cognitive (9 studies), or mixed (i.e., physical and cognitive; 7 studies), and two studies used other interventions that included older adults assisting schoolchildren and engagement via social network sites. Meta-analysis revealed that Trail Making Test (TMT) A, p =  0.05, M = 0.43, 95% CI [-0.00, 0.86], digit symbol substitution, p =  0.05, M = 0.30, 95% CI [0.00, 0.59], and verbal fluency, p =  0.04, M = 0.31, 95% CI [0.02, 0.61], improved after specific types of interventions versus the control groups (which were either active, wait-list or passive controls). When comparing physical activity interventions against all control groups, TMT A, p =  0.04, M = 0.25, 95% CI [0.01, 0.48], and digit span forward, p =  0.05, M = 0.91, 95% CI [-0.00, 1.82], significantly improved. Results remained non-significant for all outcomes when comparing cognitive activity interventions against all control groups. Results therefore suggest that healthy older adults are more likely to see cognitive improvements when involved in physical activity interventions. In addition, TMT A was the only measure that consistently showed significant improvements following physical activity interventions. Visuospatial abilities (as measured by TMT A) may be more susceptible to improvement following physical activity-based interventions, and TMT A may be a useful tool for detecting differences in that domain.

AB - Activities running in community-based-settings offer a method of delivering multimodal interventions to older adults beyond cognitive training programmes. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ‘real-world’ interventions on the cognitive abilities of healthy older adults. Database searches were performed between October 2016 and September 2018. Forty-three RCTs were eligible for inclusion with 2826 intervention participants and 2234 controls. Interventions to enhance cognitive ability consisted of participation in activities that were physical (25 studies), cognitive (9 studies), or mixed (i.e., physical and cognitive; 7 studies), and two studies used other interventions that included older adults assisting schoolchildren and engagement via social network sites. Meta-analysis revealed that Trail Making Test (TMT) A, p =  0.05, M = 0.43, 95% CI [-0.00, 0.86], digit symbol substitution, p =  0.05, M = 0.30, 95% CI [0.00, 0.59], and verbal fluency, p =  0.04, M = 0.31, 95% CI [0.02, 0.61], improved after specific types of interventions versus the control groups (which were either active, wait-list or passive controls). When comparing physical activity interventions against all control groups, TMT A, p =  0.04, M = 0.25, 95% CI [0.01, 0.48], and digit span forward, p =  0.05, M = 0.91, 95% CI [-0.00, 1.82], significantly improved. Results remained non-significant for all outcomes when comparing cognitive activity interventions against all control groups. Results therefore suggest that healthy older adults are more likely to see cognitive improvements when involved in physical activity interventions. In addition, TMT A was the only measure that consistently showed significant improvements following physical activity interventions. Visuospatial abilities (as measured by TMT A) may be more susceptible to improvement following physical activity-based interventions, and TMT A may be a useful tool for detecting differences in that domain.

KW - Cognitive ageing

KW - Community-based interventions

KW - Healthy older adults

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061297450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 110

EP - 130

JO - Ageing Research Reviews

T2 - Ageing Research Reviews

JF - Ageing Research Reviews

SN - 1568-1637

ER -