A remark on randomization of a general function of negative regularity

Tadahiro Oh, Mamoru Okamoto, Oana Pocovnicu, Nikolay Tzvetkov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the study of partial differential equations (PDEs) with random initial data and singular stochastic PDEs with random forcing, we typically decompose a classically ill-defined solution map into two steps, where, in the first step, we use stochastic analysis to construct various stochastic objects. The simplest kind of such stochastic objects is the Wick powers of a basic stochastic term (namely a random linear solution, a stochastic convolution, or their sum). In the case of randomized initial data of a general function of negative regularity for studying nonlinear wave equations (NLW), we show necessity of imposing additional Fourier–Lebesgue regularity for construct-ing Wick powers by exhibiting examples of functions slightly outside L2 (Td) such that the associated Wick powers do not exist. This shows that probabilistic well-posedness theory for NLW with general randomized initial data fails in negative Sobolev spaces (even with renormalization). Similar examples also apply to stochastic NLW and stochastic nonlinear heat equations with general white-in-time stochastic forcing, showing necessity of appropri-ate Fourier–Lebesgue γ-radonifying regularity in the construction of the Wick powers of the associated stochastic convolution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)538-554
Number of pages17
JournalProceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Series B
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Fourier-Lebesgue space
  • Probabilistic well-posedness
  • random initial data
  • stochastic forcing
  • Wick power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analysis
  • Algebra and Number Theory
  • Geometry and Topology
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A remark on randomization of a general function of negative regularity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this