A regional perspective on the impact of the privatisation of the UK public industrial property stock

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    There has been a long tradition, dating back to the 1930s, of promoting regional development in the assisted areas of the United Kingdom through the provision of industrial units. At the end of the 1980s the government decided that the time was then ripe to sell off the publicly owned portfolio of industrial and commercial property, which was predominantly to be found in the peripheral regions of the United Kingdom. The author charts the privatisation process in England and Scotland. It had been envisaged that the sale would lead to higher rents and invigorate private sector investment. More than a decade on, the author seeks to assess whether this forecast/hypothesis proved correct. The Scottish experience is used as a case study of the UK privatisation programme operating in a peripheral region, and the impact is assessed at two levels: on the Scottish market as a whole; and in the postprivatisation experience of the former publicly owned industrial estates. The original forecasts of the Conservative government prove to be naïve. No evidence of a wide-scale rise in rents, or speculative development, was found, nor has there been an increase in institutional investment in industrial property; the public sector has begun to intervene again-albeit in a different guise.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)123-139
    Number of pages17
    JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
    Volume23
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

    Fingerprint

    Privatization
    Industrial property
    Rent
    Government
    Peripheral regions
    Public sector
    Charts
    Regional development
    Scotland
    Private sector
    Institutional investment
    England

    Cite this

    @article{277f08f63e3145d8967ce2f1c405ea38,
    title = "A regional perspective on the impact of the privatisation of the UK public industrial property stock",
    abstract = "There has been a long tradition, dating back to the 1930s, of promoting regional development in the assisted areas of the United Kingdom through the provision of industrial units. At the end of the 1980s the government decided that the time was then ripe to sell off the publicly owned portfolio of industrial and commercial property, which was predominantly to be found in the peripheral regions of the United Kingdom. The author charts the privatisation process in England and Scotland. It had been envisaged that the sale would lead to higher rents and invigorate private sector investment. More than a decade on, the author seeks to assess whether this forecast/hypothesis proved correct. The Scottish experience is used as a case study of the UK privatisation programme operating in a peripheral region, and the impact is assessed at two levels: on the Scottish market as a whole; and in the postprivatisation experience of the former publicly owned industrial estates. The original forecasts of the Conservative government prove to be na{\"i}ve. No evidence of a wide-scale rise in rents, or speculative development, was found, nor has there been an increase in institutional investment in industrial property; the public sector has begun to intervene again-albeit in a different guise.",
    author = "Colin Jones",
    year = "2005",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1068/c0417",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "123--139",
    journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
    issn = "0263-774X",
    publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A regional perspective on the impact of the privatisation of the UK public industrial property stock

    AU - Jones, Colin

    PY - 2005/2

    Y1 - 2005/2

    N2 - There has been a long tradition, dating back to the 1930s, of promoting regional development in the assisted areas of the United Kingdom through the provision of industrial units. At the end of the 1980s the government decided that the time was then ripe to sell off the publicly owned portfolio of industrial and commercial property, which was predominantly to be found in the peripheral regions of the United Kingdom. The author charts the privatisation process in England and Scotland. It had been envisaged that the sale would lead to higher rents and invigorate private sector investment. More than a decade on, the author seeks to assess whether this forecast/hypothesis proved correct. The Scottish experience is used as a case study of the UK privatisation programme operating in a peripheral region, and the impact is assessed at two levels: on the Scottish market as a whole; and in the postprivatisation experience of the former publicly owned industrial estates. The original forecasts of the Conservative government prove to be naïve. No evidence of a wide-scale rise in rents, or speculative development, was found, nor has there been an increase in institutional investment in industrial property; the public sector has begun to intervene again-albeit in a different guise.

    AB - There has been a long tradition, dating back to the 1930s, of promoting regional development in the assisted areas of the United Kingdom through the provision of industrial units. At the end of the 1980s the government decided that the time was then ripe to sell off the publicly owned portfolio of industrial and commercial property, which was predominantly to be found in the peripheral regions of the United Kingdom. The author charts the privatisation process in England and Scotland. It had been envisaged that the sale would lead to higher rents and invigorate private sector investment. More than a decade on, the author seeks to assess whether this forecast/hypothesis proved correct. The Scottish experience is used as a case study of the UK privatisation programme operating in a peripheral region, and the impact is assessed at two levels: on the Scottish market as a whole; and in the postprivatisation experience of the former publicly owned industrial estates. The original forecasts of the Conservative government prove to be naïve. No evidence of a wide-scale rise in rents, or speculative development, was found, nor has there been an increase in institutional investment in industrial property; the public sector has begun to intervene again-albeit in a different guise.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14644399185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1068/c0417

    DO - 10.1068/c0417

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 123

    EP - 139

    JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

    JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

    SN - 0263-774X

    IS - 1

    ER -